- Joined
- Apr 20, 2025
- Messages
- 7,465
Nah man, I just listen to Warrior-Z to know how to win debates.this is why you watch leftist video essays and memorize every single logical fallancy so you can win arguments
Nah man, I just listen to Warrior-Z to know how to win debates.this is why you watch leftist video essays and memorize every single logical fallancy so you can win arguments
I'm already a muslim so I give LLLLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ's to many lolipedosNah man, I just listen to Warrior-Z to know how to win debates.
no dude but genuinely litterally I usually don't care about logical fallacies but it's litterally all they dothis is why you watch leftist video essays and memorize every single logical fallancy so you can win arguments
You shouldno dude but genuinely litterally I usually don't care about logical fallacies
this might be the most dummyed argument ever broHe is a real woman and LOLICON
noob playing in mega brutal difficulty
like at the start he talks about how its some sort of "art" that can't be really enable pedophilic thoughts but at the 7 or 8 minute mark the video confirms that it is indeed porn and it has something to with child characters in sexual scenarios but he says that we can use loli to treat pedophiles so that they don't abuse children.this might be the most dummyed argument ever bro
in 1:43 he confirms that lolicon is pornographic
But in 4:41 he says that we can't decide whether something is pornographic or not and says that lolicon might have an "artistic value". (he called lolicon porn is his whole argument is invalid and he confirmed that lolicon has no artistic merit)
Also not all art has the same value and most philosophers agree that some art have higher artistic value than others or some have none.
Like the Crying boy by Bruno Amadio as seen as "low value" because it tries to be simple with its message instead of deepening its value or the mona lisa painting is seen as "high value" because of the enw drawing techniques it has brought.
if something is considered "porn" it can't have any artistic merit because you can't parody something you masturbate to.
And he still goes on about how lolicon (porn) can help real ppeodphiles cope and leave their bad trait behind.
Which is just stupid because you are just enabling their addiction like how nicotine products enables a smokers addiction and still giving the same harm.
( 8minute mark) And he talks about having pedophilic thoughts isn't that serious and we should have empathy for them to better themselves and leave this bad thoughts behind.
uuh so like people don't cretae csam videos out of nowhere they watch tons of other csam videos (or other works that enbale peodphilic thoughts like lolicon etc.) and they decide to do the real thing.
If you let these bad thoughts harbor for a long time it will create problems.
That is why you can still be arrested even if you were just thiking about killing somebody or doing a mass shooting.
you technically didn't do anything but you possess a high risk.
>reddit sppace
Also it is about the visual sexualization of a child character because it can create and enable peodphilic thoughts in someones mind.
And if you enable these behaviours for a long time you will get the very bad case of children being sexually assaulted.
This is not a slippery slope its the very close next step to the degeneracy.
God this video was dummyed
I don't want to believe that these are actual peoplewhy do lolipedos exist? like why do you jerk off to kids? what made you that way?
like pick a side bro its either "its art" or "its cope material made to fix pedophiles"like at the start he talks about how its some sort of "art" that can't be really enable pedophilic thoughts but at the 7 or 8 minute mark the video confirms that it is indeed porn and it has something to with child characters in sexual scenarios but he says that we can use loli to treat pedophiles so that they don't abuse children.
Like why the sudden switch like tehse two contradict with eachother
like it either is affiliated with peodphilic thoughts or notlike pick a side bro its either "its art" or "its cope material made to fix pedophiles"
you now that is like actually really cruel for you to doThere's already been a fix for pedophilia for a while now.
View attachment 154574
I think I should turn this into a videothis might be the most dummyed argument ever bro
in 1:43 he confirms that lolicon is pornographic
But in 4:41 he says that we can't decide whether something is pornographic or not and says that lolicon might have an "artistic value". (he called lolicon porn is his whole argument is invalid and he confirmed that lolicon has no artistic merit)
Also not all art has the same value and most philosophers agree that some art have higher artistic value than others or some have none.
Like the Crying boy by Bruno Amadio as seen as "low value" because it tries to be simple with its message instead of deepening its value or the mona lisa painting is seen as "high value" because of the enw drawing techniques it has brought.
if something is considered "porn" it can't have any artistic merit because you can't parody something you masturbate to.
And he still goes on about how lolicon (porn) can help real ppeodphiles cope and leave their bad trait behind.
Which is just stupid because you are just enabling their addiction like how nicotine products enables a smokers addiction and still giving the same harm.
( 8minute mark) And he talks about having pedophilic thoughts isn't that serious and we should have empathy for them to better themselves and leave this bad thoughts behind.
uuh so like people don't cretae csam videos out of nowhere they watch tons of other csam videos (or other works that enbale peodphilic thoughts like lolicon etc.) and they decide to do the real thing.
If you let these bad thoughts harbor for a long time it will create problems.
That is why you can still be arrested even if you were just thiking about killing somebody or doing a mass shooting.
you technically didn't do anything but you possess a high risk.
>reddit sppace
Also it is about the visual sexualization of a child character because it can create and enable peodphilic thoughts in someones mind.
And if you enable these behaviours for a long time you will get the very bad case of children being sexually assaulted.
This is not a slippery slope its the very close next step to the degeneracy.
God this video was dummyed
I think pointing out their flaws is the better playThe winning move is not to play because it's hard to argue with people arguing in bad faith, use logical fallacies and engage in mental gymnastics. You will not win because they don't want to listen to you. Their goal is to normalize pedophilia, not seek the truth. The pen is only mightier than the sword if the person you're up against is reasonable
This is unrelated to the main topic, but art is also valued for the amount of effort it took to create. Higher effort usually means better product. The reason banana on wall is universally reviled and the Mona Lisa isn't, is because one took infinitely more effort than the other to create.Also not all art has the same value and most philosophers agree that some art have higher artistic value than others or some have none.
Like the Crying boy by Bruno Amadio as seen as "low value" because it tries to be simple with its message instead of deepening its value or the mona lisa painting is seen as "high value" because of the enw drawing techniques it has brought.
eeeeh 50/50This is unrelated to the main topic, but art is also valued for the amount of effort it took to create. Higher effort usually means better product. The reason banana on wall is universally reviled and the Mona Lisa isn't, is because one took infinitely more effort than the other to create.
But doxing is like infinitely funnier doeI think pointing out their flaws is the better play
going down to their playing field will not give you any good results
I don't have a problem with doxing but we should still try to conceptulize our argument in a good way so that they can't seen as the "victims"But doxing is like infinitely funnier doe