FartmingerFuckwadCheesest
"Oh, no, incoming fart attack!"
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2025
- Messages
- 16,310
>Some rando's Substack who sources the Guardian (totally reputable) and mostly Stephen Kotkin, who was born in 1959.
>Some rando's Substack who sources the Guardian (totally reputable) and mostly Stephen Kotkin, who was born in 1959.
He hired a nonce. Being Beria.I wouldn't be surprised if Stalin were a nonce though. I wouldn't put it past him.
It took me a little looking around but apparantly it's some normie neoliberal substack about bad shit everybody already knows about Isreal but on first sight it looked 100% pro isreal geg>Some rando's Substack who sources the Guardian (totally reputable) and mostly Stephen Kotkin, who was born in 1959.
>using youtube shorts as your primary source
It's convenient how whenever you want to get rid of someone during that era of the Soviet union they're always conveniently some sort of criminal you can't object aboutHe hired a nonce. Being Beria.
Whom had corpses of children in his home which Stalin knew about.He hired a nonce. Being Beria.
Beastmode>using youtube shorts as your primary source
Snopes?>using youtube shorts as your primary source
And Urho Kekkonen considered such people as friends.Whom had corpses of children in his home which Stalin knew about.![]()
Beria was undoubtedly a diddy blud doe. There's a reason he was executed.It's convenient how whenever you want to get rid of someone during that era of the Soviet union they're always conveniently some sort of criminal you can't object about
The whole USSR was built open pedophiles backstabbing each other for power.It's convenient how whenever you want to get rid of someone during that era of the Soviet union they're always conveniently some sort of criminal you can't object about
True, though beria's crimes go waaaay back. It's pretty undeniable that he was a sick fuck. In the end they got him for treason, which is pretty much what they got everyone for at the time.It's convenient how whenever you want to get rid of someone during that era of the Soviet union they're always conveniently some sort of criminal you can't object about
Same goes for democracyThe whole USSR was built open pedophiles backstabbing each other for power.
Despite having fought AGAINST the reds?And Urho Kekkonen considered such people as friends.
His crimes were literally known. But questioning or talking about would get you killed by the NVKDTrue, though beria's crimes go waaaay back. It's pretty undeniable that he was a sick fuck.
Kekkonen never fought. Mannerheim did. Kekkonen did nothing but surrender to the USSR and sell out Finland's resources to it. He never fought anything. Even participates in operations to arrest Anti-Communists who wanted to bomb the headquarters of the Finnish communist party, kill communists and try to ambush CPSU party members in Finland whom kekkonen willingly invited to Helsinki.Despite having fought AGAINST the reds?
During his presidency, he made it illegal in the Finnish law to insult the Soviet Union and the Communist Party. He made it illegal to even be negative towards it, and he even made it illegal to hold protests against it.Despite having fought AGAINST the reds?
That sounds more like anti-terrorism than being idealogical motivatedEven participates in operations to arrest Anti-Communists who wanted to bomb the headquarters of the Finnish communist party, kill communists and try to ambush CPSU party members in Finland whom kekkonen willingly invited to Helsinki.
Enforcing neutrality, he knew what "protests" really areDuring his presidency, he made it illegal in the Finnish law to insult the Soviet Union and the Communist Party. He made it illegal to even be negative towards it, and he even made it illegal to hold protests against it.