SNCAреԁіа Shroom articles.

[shipment]

I have no clue if this is a topic allowed to be held on here considering the wordfilter, but I thought it'd worth making a thread about regardless. Should a small few come together and actually update the Shroom sub-section of articles to be up-to-date? Most of them are either comically short and or outdated, and I believe it would be in our interest as a forum to have that not be the case.

 

[shipment]

Brutal noreplypill

 

[Literal Who Number #271]

Brutal noreplypill

Gemmy Thread: 0 reppeys
Bait Thread: 6 gorillion reppeys

 

[Dagonet]

Gemmy Thread: 0 reppeys
Bait Thread: 6 gorillion reppeys

But dat PPH doe

 

[grimmki]

do dis

 

[Nikizno]

I have no clue if this is a topic allowed to be held on here considering the wordfilter, but I thought it'd worth making a thread about regardless. Should a small few come together and actually update the Shroom sub-section of articles to be up-to-date? Most of them are either comically short and or outdated, and I believe it would be in our interest as a forum to have that not be the case.
View attachment 91845

Yeah. Sure, someone should do that. Except shroomcucks don't do anything.

 

[Barry]

Yeah. Sure, someone should do that. Except shroomcucks don't do anything.

>Not doing anything

 

[Namefag]

I would if not for the fact that I don't want to

 

[shipment]

.pmuB

 

[Idkchud]

I have no clue if this is a topic allowed to be held on here considering the wordfilter, but I thought it'd worth making a thread about regardless. Should a small few come together and actually update the Shroom sub-section of articles to be up-to-date? Most of them are either comically short and or outdated, and I believe it would be in our interest as a forum to have that not be the case.
View attachment 91845

What parts of the article need updating, I've been updating the shroom happenings page.

 

[shipment]

What parts of the article need updating, I've been updating the shroom happenings page.

Uh.... Well uh... uhhh.. Could you repeat that?

 

[Idkchud]

Uh.... Well uh... uhhh.. Could you repeat that?

I meant Soyjak Forum, not the Soyjak Forum/Happenings which I have been updating

 

[PRINCE VEGETA]

Isn't this a hostile offsiter wiki doe

 

[ATWA ya dig?]

Down.

 

[Idkchud]

Isn't this a hostile offsiter wiki doe

no?

 

[angkar]

no?

sncapedia is pretty much a hub for splintercucks to advertise their dead noob websites so

 

[Bobby Baccalà]

Isn't this a hostile offsiter wiki doe

Not really, Gold even banned chinnycucks from editing it (specifically SFAW)

 

[Idkchud]

discorddrama.irrelevanty is pretty much a hub for splintercucks to advertise their dead noob websites so

and it's also for shit the 'ki does not want documented or cares for, this just happens to be splinters and other crap.

Not really, Gold even banned chinnycucks from editing it (specifically SFAW)

Meh. I wouldn't say that is the case, from what I know the reasoning for banning real woman and SFAW was more due to real woman being a pedophile and SFAW being a part of Totencord. If they did crack down on the Chinny they wouldn't allow Chinny links then.

 

[Idkchud]

I love gemming up templates on sncapedia so much