>What is it with you stupid fucking bald man cacaots and wanting to fuck kids? Every other soycuck noob is a shitskin filipino or brazilian or some other 3rd world putrid sludge abomination of a subhuman mutt who cant keep their kiddy fucking gooning addiction in their pants I'm fucking over it, and it's the go-to accusation for everyone because in this noob world being called a pedophile is the only thing that holds weight anymore
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts

Soyjak blog

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cat
  • Start date Start date
  • Defunct 
  • Tags Tags
    dead failsite glowberg jerry is a dummyed cacaot kill glowberg pedophile site pushing thirty rotting corpse zombified
Dead site/group/whatever

Lock this thread?


  • Total voters
    36
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
You need to understand that moon is just as obsessed as shroot, stop embarrassing yourself by being his footsoldier.
not really Shroot is still seething way more in this thread then moon has, and no I’m not praising him but most literally I’ve seen much less compared to Shroot. Honestly that’s apart of the reason I use the Shroom less because it’s just crying at the other site
 
>he's a hecking wholesome chungus! He NEEDS to be a hecking janny!!
he's a hecking wholesome chungus! He NEEDS to be a hecking janny!!
C891BF98-B838-4F10-8FD1-E124BDEA5F89.jpeg
 
That being said the reason why the jarty is "luh bad n sheit" isn't cause they hated the sharty or something, it's because they're actual pedophiles that had cordpedos and shitlitanoobs on their site gooning 24/7 to 'p
At first yes but then when the Shitlita ban became a hot topic on the soysphere unlike sharty (where they banned any kind of use of it and this is a good thing) they permitted it if you didn't do pedo or bait shit (this was a horrible idea) and later the jarty became a furry infested shithole filled with soytan gooners and also the release of the soytan rape comic was like a salt to the injury
(TLDR: at first they called it bad because it hated the sharty but after some time jarty hate was justified because it became a furry infested shithole)
 
At first yes but then we the Shitlita ban became a hot topic on the soysphere unlike sharty (where they banned any kind of use of it and this is a good thing) they permitted it if you didn't do pedo or bait shit (this was a horrible idea) and later the jarty became a furry infested shithole filled with soytan gooners and also the release of the soytan rape comic was like a salt to the injury
(TLDR: at first they called it bad because it hated the sharty but after some time jarty hate was justified because it became a furry infested shithole)
Im not saying why they're hated I'm saying why they're bad THOUGH
 
not really Shroot is still seething way more in this thread then moon has, and no I’m not praising him but most literally I’ve seen much less compared to Shroot. Honestly that’s apart of the reason I use the Shroom less because it’s just crying at the other site
We have art contests, countrywars, game nights, gemmy polls, and much more.
You just miss out on all of it because you are too sensitive and nobody likes you.
Some friendly advice: stop defending moon and his site.
Your loyalty means nothing to him, he will betray you eventually. It's inevitable.
 
why the fuck he posted the impjak in the brimstone thread right before the shitty Shitlita pedo joke?
No clue. He made that thread just as a dump for the most abhorrent pedobrim shit and then uses the title as an excuse

Also Shitlita was banned on the Schlog at the time and none of us punished Moon for it. I never knew the thread existed and I don't know why Doll or any of the jannies didn't do anything about it
 
okay but you should’ve added that to the original screenshot because that is taken entirely out of context, also that is vantablack brimstone.
But by that logic any image you post even if you criticize it makes you supportive of it, and that doesn’t really make sense when he’s saying it’s a awful image
If he posted lolicon porn in "Post vantablack brimstone", does it make it fine even if he "hates" it?
 
okay but you should’ve added that to the original screenshot because that is taken entirely out of context, also that is vantablack brimstone.
But by that logic any image you post even if you criticize it makes you supportive of it, and that doesn’t really make sense when he’s saying it’s a awful image
no the problem is that he even has this type of image saved
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom