Soyspeak is better doebeit
It's not very clear. Yes and no, it depends on how musdummy feels that particular day.
I don't know these filters. Jarty jardee test. Swinny swenney test. 4cuck 4chan forechan test.
Yes.
Oh also sorry to bother again but is <templatestyles src="Frootyeffect.css"/> only limited to templates or can i put in on an example template?
You can use it as you please.
We shouldn't reward people for attention-whoring.
It's still attention-whoring and "MUH BAIT".
What? Why? I thought the rules were against linking to splinters in any way or form (including in the form of archives, which as the Shiwi pointed out is really dummyed). If that's the case, then allow zarty and sncapedia archive links then if we're allowing "Quotecord-approved" splinter links.
Well, I'm the wiki admin and I say archives are allowed (Quote agrees regardless). I would've said "except archives of shitholes like the NuJarty" but I scrubbed the wiki of most of those already so there's no problem.
Wait so what are the differences between sncapedia's policy and yours?
'ncapedia lets you document new splinters/pedophilic splinters like the chinny and I usually don't (exceptions exist such as when the splinter is already dead)
no I meant to linking to splinters, not discussing them in a page o algo
you can link them for archives since we need archives to function as a wiki
If Jimbo got cancer would that mean he became full of himself?
