The Sharty / Soyjak.st

[𓅰𓅪𓃯]

What are some good boards besides soy?

/qa/ so you can stim to mares and Homestuck gemmies.

 

[StudioExcréments]

https://soyjak.st/soy/thread/14987150.html#14987453Did the site actually get auctioned?

 

[OrHoweverTheBurgerIsEaten]

https://soyjak.st/soy/thread/14987150.html#14987453Did the site actually get auctioned?

thats AI geeeg

 

[Literal Who Number #271]

https://soyjak.st/soy/thread/14987150.html#14987453Did the site actually get auctioned?

Most obvious bait

 

[StudioExcréments]

Most obvious bait

Idk im still psychotish i saw the admin nametag i was unable to accept either belief or non belief

 

[Literal Who Number #271]

Idk im still psychotish i saw the admin nametag i was unable to accept either belief or non belief

It's clearly AI. If you look closely at the words, you'll notice some errors.

 

[StudioExcréments]

It's clearly AI. If you look closely at the words, you'll notice some errors.

Everything looks wrong i cant tell if something is from brain fog or actually wrong. But what ever im coping i got baited boohoo.

 

[Literal Who Number #271]

Everything looks wrong i cant tell if something is from brain fog or actually wrong. But what ever im coping i got baited boohoo.

Don't worry, man, you'll get over it.

 

[Idkchud]

they finally unrangebanned new zealand, finally.

oh I'm permabanned fucking hell.

 

[Idkchud]

I've never seen this function before

 

[𓅰𓅪𓃯]

I've never seen this function before
View attachment 89251

[Content blocked: violates UK Online Safety Act s.179(2)].

 

[korg]

I've never seen this function before
View attachment 89251

What could this possibly be?

What could this possibly be?

I looked it up
"Section 179 of the UK Online Safety Act 2023 criminalizes the sending of messages that are known to be false, with the intention to cause non-trivial physical or psychological harm to a likely audience, without reasonable excuse. This "false communications" offense replaces previous, broader legislation like s127(2) of the Communications Act 2003.
Key Components of the Offence (s.179):
Action: A person sends a message (as defined in section 182).
Knowledge: The message conveys information that the sender knows to be false.
Intent: The sender intends to cause non-trivial psychological or physical harm to a likely audience (individuals who encounter the message).
No Excuse: There is no reasonable excuse for sending the message.
Legal Context and Penalties:
Jurisdiction: Applies to England, Wales, and Northern Ireland.
Penalty: It is a summary-only offense, punishable by up to 51 weeks in prison and/or a fine.
Exemptions: Section 180 provides exemptions for recognized news publishers, licensed broadcasters, and cinema films.
Purpose: The provision aims to tackle online misinformation and malicious communication that causes real-world harm, with a higher threshold of intent than prior laws. "

 

[sugarfree]

quotecord shenanigans man

I've never seen this function before
View attachment 89251

i remember seeing this actually occur on /pol/ maybe a month or two ago, i hovered over the symbol which was the same as the restricted thread icon and it read 'restricted'

 

[Chudson88]

so many wordfilters for some snca discord irc wiki soycraft booru namecaca drama that i got autobanned for quoting
>adding 19234819384931 useless noob wordfilters because you're obsessed with nusois calling people esl african fnf pedo j4rtycoon sesotho mexican branoobs

 

[blackops2]

geg they just banned 95% of shroomcucks

 

[Mazel]

No more underage. Now you have to be 18+ to post

 

[Apeson]

We are about to get a lot of refugees.

This is a shocking but long overdue change tbh.

 

[worldatwar]

We are about to get a lot of refugees.

This is a shocking but long overdue change tbh.

why?

 

[Apeson]

why?

The sharty is now 18+

 

[Perfect Pepsilord]

No more underage. Now you have to be 18+ to post

How are they going to enforce it?