>CIA IS MAKE MY SON GAY
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts
  • Boards are being moved around and added. Leave feedback in this thread and let jannies move your threads

Itt: Post your random thoughts

  • Thread starter Thread starter Onzikin
  • Start date Start date
  • Featured
  • Tags Tags
    bababahavalanabakebenbeeevejbrjr elephant poop video on road elephant pooping video elephant video funny huge brap depository i was raped yesterday noob poop noobs official shroom discord server onzikn raped me yesterday onzikn says hrt und bbc ist guten onzikn shocks xer clit with brazil showerheads op is a noob randalsoy stole the testosterone off my body ribbon owned this caca shit everybody cares about shit i care about skin onshitskin tips and tricks for professional raping wawa
Every furthest corner of the political spectrum is absolutely ridiculous to seek and strive for besides Anarchism. Doesn’t mean full-blown Anarchism is a good thing—it’s a tad too heavy-handed, dangerous and consequential for my liking—but it’s the best of all evils. “Evil” isn’t the right word, it’s not evil in of itself, just dangerous to those living under it.

I think that’s why I like Minarchism so much, best of all worlds, although I never really sided with the belief of land being a good to be bought or sold. I always found that absolutely ridiculous, and it does nothing but divide communities through structural inequality and forbidden access, alongside the wildlife through environmental degradation.

My political beliefs are all quite scattered about really. I’ve always stood by habitat conservation and other similar green” views that stand against Minarchism. Free markets aren’t exactly free under environmental regulation. The same applies to my views on land as mentioned prior which once again infringes on the belief of protected private property so foundational in most forms of Libertarian thought.

A view of mine that doesn’t clash however is immigration, as any country can be as 'closed' as the people and property owners want it to be. To add I belief that upholding some form of culture is needed to stabilise any form of political movement, as without it you will alienate and disorient the people, who inherently hate change. Everything else about Minarchism though I stand completely by, and I believe them to be the best political way of things. I suppose that’s also because it’s quite close to tried-and-true tribal life, now under the modern light. Voluntary cooperation and groups to aid others and stand sreal womang, self-correction and authority with a minimal amount of law in place to halt violent individuals tearing down group cohesion, you can leave and join communities as you please all with differing rules to suit your needs, I could go on and on.

Wrote all this during an English period because I’m not fucking bothered with the busy-work. This is likely chockablock with grammatical errors but I don’t care because I’m bored and a selfish little fuck. I say all this like I’m politically versed or inclined beyond the surface level, not really man, not at all.
 
Last edited:
Normals really need to put two-and-two together and start burning their own damn music again instead of buying shitty albums online for exorbitant prices. Albums which they'll only listen to once, take a picture with, and then place it on a shelf where it'll be never touched again
 
Every furthest corner of the political spectrum is absolutely ridiculous to seek and strive for besides Anarchism. Doesn’t mean full-blown Anarchism is a good thing—it’s a tad too heavy-handed, dangerous and consequential for my liking—but it’s the best of all evils. “Evil” isn’t the right word, it’s not evil in of itself, just dangerous to those living under it.

I think that’s why I like Minarchism so much, best of all worlds, although I never really sided with the belief of land being a good to be bought or sold. I always found that absolutely ridiculous, and it does nothing but divide communities through structural inequality and forbidden acces, alongside the wildlife through environmental degradation.

My political beliefs are all quite scattered about really. I’ve always stood by habitat conservation and other similar green” views that stand against Minarchism. Free markets aren’t exactly free under environmental regulation. The same applies to my views on land as mentioned prior which once again infringes on the belief of protected private property so foundational in most forms of Libertarian thought.

A view of mine that doesn’t clash however unless done right is immigration, any country can be as 'closed' as the people and property owners want it to be so there’s that. To add I belief that upholding some form of culture is needed to stabilise any form of political movement, as without it you will alienate and disorient the people, who inherently hate change. Everything else about Minarchism though I stand completely by, and I believe them to be the best political way of things. I suppose that’s also because it’s quite close to tried-and-true tribal life, now under the modern light. Voluntary cooperation and groups to aid others and stand sreal womang, self-correction and authority with a minimal amount of law in place to halt violent individuals tearing down group cohesion, you can leave and join communities as you please all with differing rules to suit your needs, I could go on and on.

Wrote all this during an English period because I’m not fucking bothered with the busy-work. This is likely chockablock with grammatical errors but I don’t care because I’m bored and a selfish little fuck. I say all this like I’m politically versed or inclined beyond the surface level, not really man, not at all.
not reading all of this
 
Back
Top Bottom