>Woah! And there it is! The hilarious greentext CIA soyjaks! That's all I get for running this site
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts
  • Boards are being moved around and added. Leave feedback in this thread and let jannies move your threads

SoyBooru / Soybooru.com

  • Thread starter Thread starter Empire of Soyim
  • Start date Start date
  • Featured
  • General Soysphere 
  • Tags Tags
    boorucuck gillkoyim is a brappy caca jimbo was raped by a black homeless man kill all boorubraps kill all boorucucks musdummy was fu.ck.ed by many noob op here i'm trans btw op is a noob op is a cacaot op is a noob op is gaaay op is trans btw if that matters op was a sex slave for al quaeda snca trevor is a pedophile wordsalot is a cacaot wordsalot is a noob wordsalot lost wordsalot was raped by a black homeless man
General thread
1776187372425.png
bro
 
Just bothered to check and there's roughly 450 active posters to the site (4.7% of all 'ru users) - excluding those who didn't just post a ten or so times and leave. We in comparison have roughly 65 active posters (8% of all Shroomers). We definitely need to add something somewhere on here to incentivize user retention. Quality over quantity, sure, but still there's no harm in fresh faces.
 
  • Hmmm...
Reactions: CX2
Just bothered to check and there's roughly 450 active posters to the site (4.7% of all 'ru users) - excluding those who didn't just post a ten or so times and leave. We in comparison have roughly 65 active posters (8% of all Shroomers). We definitely need to add something somewhere on here to incentivize user retention. Quality over quantity, sure, but still there's no harm in fresh faces.
alone.jpeg
or we could just shut it down
 
Just bothered to check and there's roughly 450 active posters to the site (4.7% of all 'ru users) - excluding those who didn't just post a ten or so times and leave. We in comparison have roughly 65 active posters (8% of all Shroomers). We definitely need to add something somewhere on here to incentivize user retention. Quality over quantity, sure, but still there's no harm in fresh faces.
we should probably be like more splinter-oriented, do raids, make a shit ton of official social media accounts. unfortunately i don't see that happening in the near future while the current owner remains a dead noob mushroom and there aren't much people who are actually willing to do all of this shit
 
And that same russian ended up posting the cobson dnb pic used by foodists. We should nuke the ruzzian thread since it's gonna be non-supervised hellhole
I dislike dnb. But it was a common sight on every soysphere site before it was banned a few months ago.
I don't think calling it foodist is right, more like just poor taste.
 
isnt this why the sharty is so shit doebeit
there are good normies and there are bad normies. if we selectively allow newcaca and only keep those who are truly willing to integrate it'll be just fine. the passive ones will get filtered out by themselves and the bad posters will be dealt with
 
but as of now, the best we can do is wait for another quote's schizophrenia-induced -caust and hope people are actually willing to migrate here
 
It was banned in early 2025; you could get perma'd for posting it.
It was banned in August and most people who get banned for it seem to get unbanned anyways. It's a sharty meme not a fewdist one, but it is better off dead anyways.
 
It was banned in August and most people who get banned for it seem to get unbanned anyways. It's a sharty meme not a fewdist one, but it is better off dead anyways.
Im surprised it took so long to formally ban it, since it's CAM (child abuse material) which is illegal in the USA and most other countries
 
Last edited:
Im surprised it took so long to formally ban it, since it's CAM (child abuse material) which is illegal in the USA and most other countries
It's because the image itself came from a news article if i'm not mistaken. There is probably some kind of loophole regarding freedom of the press.
 
Back
Top Bottom