>IM NOT LEAKING
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts

Why do you hate babyjak/Supreme?

Status
Not open for further replies.
"because its of a soyjak used to depict babies, thats been astroturfed if thats the right term by admins to be an age regressor, when its clearly not"
Well clearly it has a stubble and is based on a soyjak so I don't understand this argument
 
Babyjak porn is fine
How do you even know me?
Screenshot_20260414_135628_Brave.jpg
 
Babyjak has always been portrayed as an age regressing adult ever since /caca/
Take your meds, during soot, kuz (well maybe not kuz he was an actual pedo), cabal, froot and early quote era you'd get banned for posting babyjak porn because it is meant to depict a child.
Only recently have the (((admins))) said it's an age regressor.
 
"Take your meds, during soot, kuz (well maybe not kuz he was an actual pedo), cabal, froot and early quote era you'd get banned for posting babyjak porn because it is meant to depict a child.
Only recently have the (((admins))) said it's an age regressor."

???
It literally has a stubble
 
"Take your meds, during soot, kuz (well maybe not kuz he was an actual pedo), cabal, froot and early quote era you'd get banned for posting babyjak porn because it is meant to depict a child.
Only recently have the (((admins))) said it's an age regressor."

???
It literally has a stubble
IAS Padding, during more civilized eras of the soysphere everything on /soy/ and soybooru had to be a soyjak, therefore a stubble must be present unless it's something like chudjak or kuzjak
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom