Irrelevant to the pointIAS Padding, during more civilized eras of the soysphere everything on /soy/ and soybooru had to be a soyjak, therefore a stubble must be present unless it's something like chudjak or kuzjak
Get bitched by Warrior Z liaroid
It is relevant to the point, had babyjak been made during more modern eras he would not have a stubble. The only reason he does is to be counted as IASIrrelevant to the point
So? It's still a stubble and you can not wish it away because you don't like itIt is relevant to the point, had babyjak been made during more modern eras he would not have a stubble. The only reason he does is to be counted as IAS
I could take a shit and eat it, then say it's chocolateIAS padding isn't the same and Supreme has made it clear many many MANY times that his posts aren't portraying a child
Do not disrespect the Big Z like this, son
Why do you wanna defend pedophilic art so bad?So? It's still a stubble and you can not wish it away because you don't like it
But what if you entered a pastry and they required you to turn the poop into chocolate? Would it still make sense for you to turn around and say that it's still poop? No, it would notI could take a shit and eat it, then say it's chocolate
it won't magicially turn it into chocolate, at the end of the day it'll still be shit.
How are people like Smartschoolboy9 not paedos by this logic?So? It's still a stubble and you can not wish it away because you don't like it
I find it funny. Actually I might post it in this threadWhy do you wanna defend pedophilic art so bad?
Do you find it attractive or why are you trying so hard to justify it
That noob groomed kids he's not a good exampleHow are people like Smartschoolboy9 not paedos by this logic?