>While these Soyjacks were originally created by rightist circles such as 4chan and such, they've… changed, a bit. Some people started growing attached to the cartoons and made various edits of the soyjacks in different, weird situations such as dancing, or soyjack edits that seem to be parodying something that doesn't exist, or soyjacks with fruit in their heads. One of such edits is the picture you see of two soyjacks just kind of hanging out with eachother, with no offensive background that I know of.
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts
  • Boards are being moved around and added. Leave feedback in this thread and let jannies move your threads

Pussssssssiessssssssss

nobody gaf about your pedo apologist agenda bro, this isn't booru. the absolute majority of shroom users, including jannies, consider babyjak to be a child. continue defending babyjak 'p and see what happens to your stupid ass
babyjak was already considered a child
Just look at old 'tosses made using babyjaks and you will understand my point
The recent "HTSM extermination force" says that its an adult and its fine to make porn of it if you go against this rhetoric then ur a HTSM
 
so how are you going to represent cacas in the shitty
I'm genuinely curious to know @MethylX , how would YOU represent the underaged in the sharty?
If the cacajak is an aged regressed adult, and shitlita is made for pedonoobs, then what 'jak would represent them?

Creating any 'toss to resemble a minor would be considered a subvariation of the shitlita, so that's a no go.
Nate is broadly used for anyone who isn't underaged (post-cacacaust)
 
Ban dis pedo already [tsnoob]
nuswa this is soybooru.com/forum
1767250530877.png
 
Back
Top Bottom