>If Suggesting random quotes is your power than what are you without it?
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts

Itt: Post your random thoughts

  • Thread starter Thread starter Onzikin
  • Start date Start date
  • Featured
  • Tags Tags
    bababahavalanabakebenbeeevejbrjr elephant poop video on road elephant pooping video elephant video funny huge brap depository i was raped yesterday noob poop noobs official shroom discord server onzikn raped me yesterday onzikn says hrt und bbc ist guten onzikn shocks xer clit with brazil showerheads op is a noob randalsoy stole the testosterone off my body ribbon owned this caca shit everybody cares about shit i care about skin onshitskin tips and tricks for professional raping wawa
What country do you live in where this joke works?
I am mad over some refugee living in my area so i say stuff like this

congrats on 2900th post btw
1779045547725.png
[wholesome]
 
When does something Ironic start to became Սոіrоոіc?
And what do you consider safe edgy and REAL edgy?
A good portion of the younger generation don't believe in humour that is socially appropriate but humour that is "morally correct". Essentially, the idea of punching up versus punching down.
Brian Thompson's murder and Charlie Kirk's assassination are safe edgy, as they are something people feel okay in joking about, as it is "punching up". But Renée Nicole Good's killing and George Droyd are considered offensive, as it affected people of a minority status; therefore, it's "punching down".

Same with the Titan. Now, that was plain stupidity. Now, Stockton Rush deserved it because he was a cheap basdummy who didn't care about taking the proper precautions, even when everybody else was shouting at him not to do it, but everybody else on that vessel, especially that man's son, did not deserve it, and yet I've seen people try to justify making light of a horrific situation because it happened to people with more wealth than them. I've even seen people disregard that kid because of his father being rich. I think it's absurd.
These people only care about wealth because they aren't rich; they're the kind who would be so much worse if they had it, it's jealousy.
But also, they don't have any real morals that they're consistent about. They're just robots who think whatever is currently popular, not on their own terms.

Even 9/11, in less than 25 years, became an online punchline. Think what you want about its implications, whether it's a psyop, whether it was in vain or whether it ultimately meant nothing.
But remember that people died. Not just those in the planes or the towers, but people at ground zero; the firefighters, some died years later from respiratory diseases and cancers caused by inhaling the dust, smoke and debris; countless families were affected, and it really shook America when it happened. And this wasn't something that happened a hundred years ago like the Titanic.

I'm at the point where I wouldn't be surprised if Sandy Hook jokes started garnering attraction within the next couple of years. These people don't have a line they won't cross and again, don't consider what is or isn't socially appropriate.
 
A good portion of the younger generation don't believe in humour that is socially appropriate but humour that is "morally correct". Essentially, the idea of punching up versus punching down.
Brian Thompson's murder and Charlie Kirk's assassination are safe edgy, as they are something people feel okay in joking about, as it is "punching up". But Renée Nicole Good's killing and George Droyd are considered offensive, as it affected people of a minority status; therefore, it's "punching down".

Same with the Titan. Now, that was plain stupidity. Now, Stockton Rush deserved it because he was a cheap basdummy who didn't care about taking the proper precautions, even when everybody else was shouting at him not to do it, but everybody else on that vessel, especially that man's son, did not deserve it, and yet I've seen people try to justify making light of a horrific situation because it happened to people with more wealth than them. I've even seen people disregard that kid because of his father being rich. I think it's absurd.
These people only care about wealth because they aren't rich; they're the kind who would be so much worse if they had it, it's jealousy.
But also, they don't have any real morals that they're consistent about. They're just robots who think whatever is currently popular, not on their own terms.

Even 9/11, in less than 25 years, became an online punchline. Think what you want about its implications, whether it's a psyop, whether it was in vain or whether it ultimately meant nothing.
But remember that people died. Not just those in the planes or the towers, but people at ground zero; the firefighters, some died years later from respiratory diseases and cancers caused by inhaling the dust, smoke and debris; countless families were affected, and it really shook America when it happened. And this wasn't something that happened a hundred years ago like the Titanic.

I'm at the point where I wouldn't be surprised if Sandy Hook jokes started garnering attraction within the next couple of years. These people don't have a line they won't cross and again, don't consider what is or isn't socially appropriate.
Yeah never before in history have people made edgy jokes. Never google the terms "punk rock" or "family guy" btw, the shit you're going to see will probably give you nightmares for the rest of your life.

Making edgy jokes is both allowed and good.
 
Yeah never before in history have people made edgy jokes. Never google the terms "punk rock" or "family guy" btw, the shit you're going to see will probably give you nightmares for the rest of your life.

Making edgy jokes is both allowed and good.
I'm not against making jokes; I never said that. My problem is when people become desensitised and end up having a vague sense of morality, because where do the jokes end and their actual beliefs surface? Having proper social etiquette is different from a show going to dark places.

I'm ashamed to admit I found some of the Titan 'jaks to be funny, but I would never honestly say the event itself was funny or that they deserved it.
My problem is when these people act as a moral police when they have none.

And no, I don't think people should be arrested for cracking jokes online. What you say online is different from an in-person interaction. It's absurd what's happening over here.
 
I'm not against making jokes; I never said that. My problem is when people become desensitised and end up having a vague sense of morality, because where do the jokes end and their actual beliefs surface? Having proper social etiquette is different from a show going to dark places.

I'm ashamed to admit I found some of the Titan 'jaks to be funny, but I would never honestly say the event itself was funny or that they deserved it.
My problem is when these people act as a moral police when they have none.

And no, I don't think people should be arrested for cracking jokes online. What you say online is different from an in-person interaction. It's absurd what's happening over here.
I more had a problem with you implying this is something new or that younger generations do it more than others. Making offensive jokes has always been accepted. Acting as morality police while doing it has also always been common.
 
Same with the Titan. Now, that was plain stupidity. Now, Stockton Rush deserved it because he was a cheap basdummy who didn't care about taking the proper precautions, even when everybody else was shouting at him not to do it
almost forgot about xim after xe was turned into human paste (or whatever the fuck happens to the human body when it implodes)
 
I more had a problem with you implying this is something new or that younger generations do it more than others.
My apologies, outside of 9/11, I was attempting to use more recent examples, not insinuate that it's a new phenomenon; however, I do believe the younger generation is becoming more desensitised while simultaneously perpetuating a moral fuss about SNCA, which does ultimately impact humour because you don't know your crowd and what you can or cannot joke about.

I'm also not trying to insinuate that the jokes match their personal beliefs because a joke is a joke, but it seems as though there's a self-fulfilling cycle in which anytime you (not you personally, but referring to them) make a joke that ties back to what you actually believe, thus unintentionally reinforcing that belief without them realising it.
 
Last edited:
My apologies, outside of 9/11, I was attempting to use more recent examples, not insinuate that it's a new phenomenon; however, I do believe the younger generation is becoming more desensitised while simultaneously perpetuating a moral fuss about SNCA, which does ultimately impact humour because you don't know your crowd and what you can or cannot joke about.

I'm also not trying to insinuate that the jokes match their personal beliefs because a joke is a joke, but it seems as though there's a self-fulfilling cycle in which anytime you (not you personally, but referring to them) make a joke that ties back to what you actually believe, thus unintentionally reinforcing that belief without them realising it.
That's fair, but I really don't think edgy jokes have that much of an impact on someones personal beliefs. As far as I know everything points towards edgy jokes having either no or very little effect on someone becoming radicalized. It's essentially always caused by real problems and grievances in society.

Edgy jokes are genuinely no more than that unless there is another component like someone actively trying to convince them the jokes are serious which is very different from just casually making edgy jokes.
 
Back
Top Bottom