Nvtral
Kushy
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2025
- Messages
- 4,814
>is homosexuality okay? is it environmental?
it settled in that homosexuality despite being biological to some point (very VERY rare cases), it is mostly environmental. it agreed that there was barely any ACTUAL biological science behind it apart from prenatal hormones which arent even close to it being suggestive. it agreed that the rise of homosexuality in minors over the last few years IS something to take seriously, as there are a lot of things in homosexual communities that shouldnt be seen or even understood as a minor.
>do you think transsexuality is okay? or well more biological than environmental than homosexuality?
it settled in that transsexualism is even MORE environmental than homosexuality, close to 0 biological studies backing it up. and it surprised me that Claude implied it ITSELF that a LOT of cases in transsexuality are fueled by disorders and bad mental states, even talking about statistics about gender affirming care not helping in the suicide thoughts or bad mental state transsexual people have. it also talked about a lot of cases also just being autogynephilia as even the study from Ray Blanchard had more arguments than most "biological" transexualism
<
despite these conversations it did not want to give a specific number in environmental transexualism or homosexualism. but after enough haggling i managed to get him to say its probably close to 40/60 homosexuality environmental/biological and 20/80 transexualism environmental/biological. i think it was interesting for an AI to make arguments for environmental identity and not against it
it settled in that homosexuality despite being biological to some point (very VERY rare cases), it is mostly environmental. it agreed that there was barely any ACTUAL biological science behind it apart from prenatal hormones which arent even close to it being suggestive. it agreed that the rise of homosexuality in minors over the last few years IS something to take seriously, as there are a lot of things in homosexual communities that shouldnt be seen or even understood as a minor.
>do you think transsexuality is okay? or well more biological than environmental than homosexuality?
it settled in that transsexualism is even MORE environmental than homosexuality, close to 0 biological studies backing it up. and it surprised me that Claude implied it ITSELF that a LOT of cases in transsexuality are fueled by disorders and bad mental states, even talking about statistics about gender affirming care not helping in the suicide thoughts or bad mental state transsexual people have. it also talked about a lot of cases also just being autogynephilia as even the study from Ray Blanchard had more arguments than most "biological" transexualism
<
despite these conversations it did not want to give a specific number in environmental transexualism or homosexualism. but after enough haggling i managed to get him to say its probably close to 40/60 homosexuality environmental/biological and 20/80 transexualism environmental/biological. i think it was interesting for an AI to make arguments for environmental identity and not against it
![[tvrkaryan]]( "TVRKARYAN [tvrkaryan]")
