Femboys are the real pedos

[myexdrew]

also because warrior z has a girlfriend who pegs him

Nvtral gets more and more giga by the second.....

 

[Onzikin]

also because warrior z has a girlfriend who pegs him

Also because Warrior-Z is muslim

 

[Hhh]

noob doesnt even say arguments he just tries to say femboys are worse than real women even though every femboy transitions eventually.

you have no evidence that they transition eventually

 

[GQQT]

cacaots = groomers = pedos
Really that simple, that formula is all encompassing

 

[myexdrew]

Also because Warrior-Z is muslim

Even doe nvtral is based and Christpilled

 

[CX2]

you have no evidence that they transition eventually

femboy here, i transitioned last week

 

[GQQT]

you have no evidence that they transition eventually

Goon overdose is a very serious medical condition

 

[myexdrew]

Goot overdose is a very serious medical condition

 

[Hhh]

Is nvtral warrior z since he wins all debates?

Warrior Z is wrong doe even if he’s a good debater

Goon overdose is a very serious medical condition

Half trve

 

[Nihilma]

I disagree and I don’t know how to change your mind cause it’s clearly very set in stone what you believe so agree to disagree I guess

Well I've worked this subject for a bit.
If you agree to let me developp for a bit, let me explain why I believe this to be the only coherent definition :

There are three components on which we can theoretically define "man" and "woman" :
- the body
- the behaviour and appearance
- the personnal feeling
- And then a mix of all of them

Defining on behaviour and appearance meanings defining man and woman on whether someone acts in a feminine or masculine way. But that implies applying these labels of man and woman to people who maybe don't want to be labelled like that. Maybe a masculine woman sees herself as a woman, maybe a feminine man sees himself as a man. Also, it implies using how one culture defines feminine and masculine for the whole world, quite racist isn't it ?
--> So defining it on behaviour is restrictive and racist, very bad.

Defining on personnal feelin is dummyed, because if it isn't based on behaviour and appearance and just a personnal feeling, well then it means that the only variable on which to define man and woman are an invisible feeling only you know, and therefore the social utility of the terms "man" and "woman" disappear, they become useless terms.
--> So defining it on personnal feelings just destroys the concept for no reason, dummyed

A mix of personnal feeling and behaviour and appearance will create incoherences, because personnal feeling and appearance and behaviour will clash, that's how we end up with trans man femboys, basically woman who call themselves man but still present in a feminine fashion because they want to be femboys. That is dummyed. Personnal feelings are personnal, behaviour and appearances are social, and the two clash. That is the modern norm though, and the way real women define gender.
--> Defining it on a mix of personnal feeling and behaviour is a cope out that doesn't work, it only forces on everyone else what you believe yourself and isolates you.

Finally, the body. In this definition, a man is a man because of his body, a woman is a woman because of her body. Sure, this definition isn't perfect because of some illnesses, intersex people. But those are ill, not the norm. Man and woman define the norm. We can deal with intersex people differently, by treating them or attributing them a gender based on other factors.
This definition allows us to classify people based on their physical realities, therefore it's useful. Because the physical reality of bodies lead to societal differences that should be taken into account, such as ability to bear a child, physical strenght, and so on.
--> Defining man and woman on the body makes these terms a useful tool.

What do you think ?

 

[Nvtral]

you have no evidence that they transition eventually

and you have no evidence of femboys being worse than real women, this whole post is worthless but deep in our hearts we both know you are the same

 

[Hhh]

Half trve cause it’s true but thag doesn’t support what nvral said

 

[Nvtral]

Well I've worked this subject for a bit.
If you agree to let me developp for a bit, let me explain why I believe this to be the only coherent definition :

There are three components on which we can theoretically define "man" and "woman" :
- the body
- the behaviour and appearance
- the personnal feeling
- And then a mix of all of them

Defining on behaviour and appearance meanings defining man and woman on whether someone acts in a feminine or masculine way. But that implies applying these labels of man and woman to people who maybe don't want to be labelled like that. Maybe a masculine woman sees herself as a woman, maybe a feminine man sees himself as a man. Also, it implies using how one culture defines feminine and masculine for the whole world, quite racist isn't it ?
--> So defining it on behaviour is restrictive and racist, very bad.

Defining on personnal feelin is dummyed, because if it isn't based on behaviour and appearance and just a personnal feeling, well then it means that the only variable on which to define man and woman are an invisible feeling only you know, and therefore the social utility of the terms "man" and "woman" disappear, they become useless terms.
--> So defining it on personnal feelings just destroys the concept for no reason, dummyed

A mix of personnal feeling and behaviour and appearance will create incoherences, because personnal feeling and appearance and behaviour will clash, that's how we end up with trans man femboys, basically woman who call themselves man but still present in a feminine fashion because they want to be femboys. That is dummyed. Personnal feelings are personnal, behaviour and appearances are social, and the two clash. That is the modern norm though, and the way real women define gender.
--> Defining it on a mix of personnal feeling and behaviour is a cope out that doesn't work, it only forces on everyone else what you believe yourself and isolates you.

Finally, the body. In this definition, a man is a man because of his body, a woman is a woman because of her body. Sure, this definition isn't perfect because of some illnesses, intersex people. But those are ill, not the norm. Man and woman define the norm. We can deal with intersex people differently, by treating them or attributing them a gender based on other factors.
This definition allows us to classify people based on their physical realities, therefore it's useful. Because the physical reality of bodies lead to societal differences that should be taken into account, such as ability to bear a child, physical strenght, and so on.
--> Defining man and woman on the body makes these terms a useful tool.

What do you think ?

i appreciate your existence and your hatred for real women but i dont think anyone here is gonna read this

 

[Hhh]

and therefore the social utility of the terms "man" and "woman" disappear, they become useless terms.
--> So defining it on personnal feelings just destroys the concept for no reason, dummyed

that’s what I want ultimately though, no?

 

[Nihilma]

i appreciate your existence and your hatred for real women but i dont think anyone here is gonna read this

Fuck my brown life i guess

 

[Nvtral]

Fuck my brown life i guess

its okay bro lets go smoke in a balcony

 

[Hhh]

and you have no evidence of femboys being worse than real women, this whole post is worthless but deep in our hearts we both know you are the same

Simply search up “femboys” and see what shows up on images,!It’s all oddly sexual. Then search up “trans” and see what shows up, it’s normal

 

[CX2]

white brown people mog brown peope

 

[Nihilma]

that’s what I want ultimately though, no?

>For no reason
As said thereafter, there is a way to use these terms in a useful manner.

By the way, to illustrate a concrete example of the usefulness of using gender ("man", "woman", "he/him", "she/her") to illustrate physical realities, we use these terms to talk about mammal animals, "my cat, he is very cute", "my dog, she is still young".
There is a usefulness here : express physical concrete realities.

 

[Hhh]

That is an example albeit, it’s a whole thing to get into.