Femboys are the real pedos

[GQQT]

Simply search up “femboys” and see what shows up on images,!It’s all oddly sexual. Then search up “trans” and see what shows up, it’s normal

 

[CX2]

Simply search up “femboys” and see what shows up on images,!It’s all oddly sexual. Then search up “trans” and see what shows up, it’s normal

tradcath femboys like me won

 

[Hhh]

>For no reason
As said thereafter, there is a way to use these terms in a useful manner.

By the way, to illustrate a concrete example of the usefulness of using gender ("man", "woman", "he/him", "she/her") to illustrate physical realities, we use these terms to talk about mammal animals, "my cat, he is very cute", "my dog, she is still young".
There is a usefulness here : express physical concrete realities.

Why do we need to make gender about what’s in your pants? That’s quite dehumanizing I’d say

 

[Hhh]

View attachment 139578

>thats truth*

 

[myexdrew]

>That’s quite dehumanizing I’d say

 

[Hhh]

 

[Hhh]

View attachment 139579

I gegged

 

[shekel]

Why do we need to make gender about what’s in your pants? That’s quite dehumanizing I’d say

You have male gametes. You will never be a woman.

 

[CX2]

View attachment 139581

BUTIFAL WAIFE

 

[Nihilma]

That is an example albeit, it’s a whole thing to get into.

Yes, it is an example of a reality.
If there is still confusion in modern times around these terms, it's because I believe that being a real woman isn't about wanting to just be feminine, it's wanting to be the other gender, and specifically wanting to have the body of the other gender.
And this is an illness. You're not supposed to have this envy, because you already have a functionning body.
Destroying these terms because of this illness is dummyed.

In my opinion, it's much clearer to use these terms for a very real reality that we need to know about (sex), rather than to destroy these useful terms because they make some people feel bad.

 

[myexdrew]

You have male gametes. You will never be a woman.

Even doe she's a pooner

 

[shekel]

Even doe she's a pooner

How are you 16 and already a disgusting sex pest?

 

[CX2]

Even doe she's a pooner

hot

 

[Hhh]

Yes, it is an example of a reality.
If there is still confusion in modern times around these terms, it's because I believe that being a real woman isn't about wanting to just be feminine, it's wanting to be the other gender, and specifically wanting to have the body of the other gender.
And this is an illness. You're not supposed to have this envy, because you already have a functionning body.
Destroying these terms because of this illness is dummyed.

In my opinion, it's much clearer to use these terms for a very real reality that we need to know about (sex), rather than to destroy these useful terms because they make some people feel bad.

I never said abolish sex that is silly. I said abolish gender

 

[pig]

[tsnoob]

Spoiler

 

[CX2]

I never said abolish sex that is silly. I said abolish gender

sybau t pito

 

[myexdrew]

How are you 16 and already a disgusting sex pest?

Bro I DON'T KNOW

 

[Hhh]

Even doe she's a pooner

Who

 

[Nihilma]

Why do we need to make gender about what’s in your pants? That’s quite dehumanizing I’d say

No, you make gender much more than what it is, that's the problem.
If you don't make gender the whole part of you, the whole definition of you, than it isn't a problem to just define it this way.
You are you, you are not just "man" or "woman". You are also man because of your body, but that's just part of you.
The most important part is that you are you, not "man" or "woman"

 

[myexdrew]

Who

Me