He "took it too far" and a rule was thusly added to stop just that. Whatever is "too far" now evidently wasn't before, our incompetent janny team needs to stop moving goalposts and set-criteria so they can justify bans. Bans which are confusing from the outside looking in due to intentionally vague wrote-up reasons as to squeeze out PPH.
He had regard as he stopped posting BBC jokes involving himself. At the end of the day, most of what he was saying was jokes, and what wasn't jokes is nothing new to this forum and within the rules. Just look at the aforementioned example of minuteman, or the various other gay and or real woman-adjacent men on this site.
>Oh, but they were over 18!
Then why is this site 16/17+ if the rules are clearly geared against them? You have one set of rules, stick to them! I'm just baffled at the incompetency, inconsistency and vagueness here at what is and isn't "OK", seeing as the defined rules mean jack shit when a janny gets the itch to ban someone.