>I farted in your moms vagina
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts
  • Boards are being moved around and added. Leave feedback in this thread and let jannies move your threads

ban bridget

Imagining having to wake up with this thing next to you in bed? No wonder Randal went insane
1789864832396.png
 
What pisses me off the most about randalsoy is that cargo never even said that loli wasn't pedophilic. He basically said "both are for sick pedophiles, but CP involves real harm to children so it's worse."
Randalsoy is just a dindu noob and he wasn't banned for "calling out" cargo.
literally was banned for that but ok.

but the whole cargo thing was ohio. both are treated as the same in some states and organizations like texas and the iwf bc they are based from irl 'p.

it wouldve been best for cargo and randal to be quiet around that sort of thing.
 
literally was banned for that but ok.

but the whole cargo thing was ohio. both are treated as the same in some states and organizations like texas and the iwf bc they are based from irl 'p.

it wouldve been best for cargo and randal to be quiet around that sort of thing.
Yea, it was a dummyed hill for cargo to die on. Pure semantic spergery; but randal is, months later, saying that he defended lolicon. It's a disingenuous, dummyed, and overly defensive argument, and randal clearly doesn't understand that somehow.
 
literally was banned for that but ok.

but the whole cargo thing was ohio. both are treated as the same in some states and organizations like texas and the iwf bc they are based from irl 'p.

it wouldve been best for cargo and randal to be quiet around that sort of thing.
Yea, it was a dummyed hill for cargo to die on. Pure semantic spergery; but randal is, months later, saying that he defended lolicon. It's a disingenuous, dummyed, and overly defensive argument, and randal clearly doesn't understand that somehow.
I think Cargo did have a point. At least in terms of priorities.
Neither of these things should exist, but the former involves real children, and it would make sense to put your focus on catching the people involved in making the real rubbish, the ones involved in sex trafficking, as these people are a more direct threat to children than those producing lolicon.
So by that I mean, put an emphasis on dealing with those people first and then move onto those producing, manufacturing, and soliciting lolicon. But I don't know if he meant it in that way.
 
Back
Top Bottom