>yeah, you know what. you are just a filthy chronically online esl noob shitskinned ape who doesn't know how to communicate and be friendly, I know you are trying to ragebait me but you fucking suck balls at your job, I am NOT your fucking slave, but I am a Slave to God almighty. You need to get your priorities straight with your life you dummy. Trying to reason with you is just talking to a brick wall, You are a lost clause you know that? Nobody loves you in this world not even this website. As what LowTierGod has said, "Your life is nothing, you serve zero purpose, YOU SHOULD KILL YOURSELF, NOW!!"
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts

Ban stupid people

1751794948031.png
ban all Tvrkaryans
 
with the recent skibidisigma drama, its clear that stupid/dummyed people have no place on this site, or the soysphere in general. Thats why I suggest that we should ban all dumbasses from this site to prevent something like this from happening again.
I suggest we start with banning @General noobnin
That's heckin ableism doe
 
Also this map shows the netherlands to have one of the highest IQ's, wich is innacurrate since the one dutch noob we have on this website is a furry
Swedistan has one of the highest even though the only shved we had was a pedophile watamote liar.
 
>Banning people based on perceived intelligence—like "low IQ"—isn't a good idea, for a few key reasons:
  1. IQ isn't everything: Intelligence is complex. A person with a lower IQ score might still have great insight, humor, creativity, or value to add to a community.
  2. It’s vague and hard to enforce: There’s no objective, fair way to measure a forum user’s intelligence. Bans based on "IQ" are bound to be arbitrary and unfair.
  3. It breeds toxicity: Policing users based on something like intelligence creates a hostile, elitist culture. That usually ends up hurting the community more than helping it.
  4. Focus on behavior, not traits: If someone is trolling, spamming, or breaking rules—ban for that. Judge users on their actions, not your assumptions about their mental capacity.
>If you want a high-quality forum, encourage thoughtful discussion, enforce clear posting rules, and model good contributions. That will do way more for your community than IQ-based gatekeeping ever could.

1751800036042.png
 
>Banning people based on perceived intelligence—like "low IQ"—isn't a good idea, for a few key reasons:

  1. IQ isn't everything: Intelligence is complex. A person with a lower IQ score might still have great insight, humor, creativity, or value to add to a community.
  2. It’s vague and hard to enforce: There’s no objective, fair way to measure a forum user’s intelligence. Bans based on "IQ" are bound to be arbitrary and unfair.
  3. It breeds toxicity: Policing users based on something like intelligence creates a hostile, elitist culture. That usually ends up hurting the community more than helping it.
  4. Focus on behavior, not traits: If someone is trolling, spamming, or breaking rules—ban for that. Judge users on their actions, not your assumptions about their mental capacity.
>If you want a high-quality forum, encourage thoughtful discussion, enforce clear posting rules, and model good contributions. That will do way more for your community than IQ-based gatekeeping ever could.
View attachment 28412
true so fucking true i cant believe you wrote that
 
Back
Top Bottom