Ban Megathread

[RandalSoy]

Yeah, and I've been to the moon and back.

I was going to post a really smug screenshot of broot messaging me like 2 years ago but twitter raped but DMs and idk the fucking pin I used for that account

 

[pig]

I can just ban evade lol I've got so many alt accounts lol DID ftw

 

[angkar]

View attachment 160724

View attachment 160725

MAYO PIG EPISTEN

 

[pig]

do you think the SS guards in auschwitz pushed other SS men into ovens to keep them running near october 1944's fuel shortages? amazing website shroot

 

[Perfect Pepsilord]

Bans on this site are fundamentally subjective and up to the discretion of the moderation team, which is a good thing. On the Schlog, we constantly argued about the rules and who should be banned or shouldn’t and we saw how that turned out. It’s much better for the mods to simply ban those who contribute negatively to the site, even if they don’t really break any rules.

As for the CX2 situation; I trust the mods' judgement in their decision, though I am saddened that this site and its culture weren't able to counteract the obvious grooming that happened to that guy.

I think that, in the future, when such a person appears again, we should make more of an effort to undo the damage inflicted on such people. Though of course if our efforts have no effect, there's no point in keeping such a guy around.

 

[worldatwar]

He didnt, xe's a janny on the chimney

i meant the sharty and its affiliate sites, not splinters. also, bad mentions aren't a thing here, so you can say chinny if u want. js don't post links to it tho.

 

[Somephono]

I did NOT use the schlog and I have no idea what we’re talking about itt

 

[worldatwar]

also doctors why is impy a janni on the chinny?

 

[Watt]

I did NOT use the schlog and I have no idea what we’re talking about itt

>I did NOT use the schlog and I have no idea what we’re talking about it

 

[grimmki]

You people are all socially-supersaturated attention-seeking vultures as always. The SECOND he gets banned you all pounce on the moment to start snidely gossiping and leaking PMs. What is your collective major malfunction that makes you all like this? Here I thought Christians had some moral standard as to not be little conniving rats.

I leaked a tiny bit of PMs with xim stop being so mean mane

 

[shekel]

@Shroot

What are you even pinging him over

 

[GQQT]

What are you even pinging him over

What even prompted him to start that shit?
Nothing
He needs to see that

 

[Nihilma]

Fuck off Christliar. Unban @CX2, his ban is sourced from nothing new being said on his part. Big fucking whoop if someone posts cacaot-spiel, the rules on this site should remain consistent if you're within the set age requirement. This is just another example of my prior pointed-out "flip-flop noobshit attitude" that the rules are enforced within on this site. Fuck sakes lads.

The rules shouldn't be strict and rigid, they need to be applied case by case and with discernment.
At the end of the day, the rules are there to keep the site up (aka to prevent it being taken down), and to keep the quality of the site up. What the rules says are just guidelines to this end. If a user straight up coals up the site and adds nothing more, than he should be removed, even if he doesn't break rules in a rigid sense.

 

[Nihilma]

You people are all socially-supersaturated attention-seeking vultures as always. The SECOND he gets banned you all pounce on the moment to start snidely gossiping and leaking PMs. What is your collective major malfunction that makes you all like this? Here I thought Christians had some moral standard as to not be little conniving rats.

What ? I've been asking for him to be dealt with for ages this is not a U-turn behaviour.
Also what's with the Christian boogeyman there's like three of us on this website ?

 

[Nihilma]

Bans on this site are fundamentally subjective and up to the discretion of the moderation team, which is a good thing. On the Schlog, we constantly argued about the rules and who should be banned or shouldn’t and we saw how that turned out. It’s much better for the mods to simply ban those who contribute negatively to the site, even if they don’t really break any rules.

As for the CX2 situation; I trust the mods' judgement in their decision, though I am saddened that this site and its culture weren't able to counteract the obvious grooming that happened to that guy.

I think that, in the future, when such a person appears again, we should make more of an effort to undo the damage inflicted on such people. Though of course if our efforts have no effect, there's no point in keeping such a guy around.

Finally some good sense in a post, I might shed a tear.
I'm baffled to see an example on the internet of a website and it's users learning from their mistakes. This is good.

 

[Idkchud]

>Report the site as hosting child pornography and get it took down for a week?
>Follow this up by spending months destroying the image of the site?
>DDoS the site with your 'cord buddies for months?
Unbanned! You've learned your lesson.
>"Hurr durr I'm built for fuggen bbc brap farts punjabi hrt kek."
BANNED PERMANENTLY.

I am absolutely mad at how as soon as Broot came back everyone is acting friendly as if his initial hostility or whatever it was made people absolutely despise him. Inconsistent this site is.

 

[shekel]

I'll forgive @Broot if he does sissy humiliation in VC with the entire site.

 

[Nihilma]

>Report the site as hosting child pornography and get it took down for a week?
>Follow this up by spending months destroying the image of the site?
>DDoS the site with your 'cord buddies for months?
Unbanned! You've learned your lesson.
>"Hurr durr I'm built for fuggen bbc brap farts punjabi hrt kek."
BANNED PERMANENTLY.

I just wanted him unbanned for a few mns because I saw him lurking and I thought it'd be funny to see him talk here, but ig he's just unbanned now.
If CX2 agreed to stop coaling up the site and actually did stop, I'd have nothing against him staying here. Fair ?

 

[𓅰𓅪𓃯]

I just wanted him unbanned for a few mns because I saw him lurking and I thought it'd be funny to see him talk here, but ig he's just unbanned now.
If CX2 agreed to stop coaling up the site and actually did stop, I'd have nothing against him staying here. Fair ?

Fair.

 

[Apeson]

I am absolutely mad at how as soon as Broot came back everyone is acting friendly as if his initial hostility or whatever it was made people absolutely despise him. Inconsistent this site is.

Holding an eternal grudge is bad for the soul. I can't say i'l be able to see him too positively ever again but i can move on from it all. Obviously i don't speak for everyone here but i'm sure other people think the same way.