>Decided to wipe pro-shroom posts. They’re all cacaots. I pray upon the downfall of that thing.
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts
  • Boards are being moved around and added. Leave feedback in this thread and let jannies move your threads

Ban Megathread

General thread
i remember of the situation, you knew he used to be a member of that and unbanned him for a while
Margecord actually and he was unbanned because Froot is a fucking liar
until some snca misunderstanding regarding an image where he was trying to mock ancaps came up and you banned him again, and when he appealed that you just decided to keep him banned
if i remember right i eventually told you to at least change the reason to "dummyed cordnoob" or some shit even though it was snca because you just wouldnt unban him and the reason he was kept banned for made him look like a pedophile
noob Doll was the one who banned him not me
 
Welcome to soyjak.forum broder... 708.gif
 
>banned
>unbanned
>banned
>temped

Stop looking for reasons to ban people and realize that not liking someone is already reason enough.
You know what I'm giving you the honor of deciding the fate of CX2. Your word will be absolute and I'll even change the banner name to you if you decide to get him perma'd
 
You know what I'm giving you the honor of deciding the fate of CX2. Your word will be absolute and I'll even change the banner name to you if you decide to get him perma'd
This is so gay.
We went over this multiple times already.

Rules are not rigid, they're flexible. Rules serve the websites, not the individual users. So ironically, rules need to be applied on a case by case basis. Different users, different treatment.

One good user makes a terrible out of line out of the ordinary joke and regrets it ? Well, you can let it slide, even if the rules say otherwise.
Another user makes just poor and annoying jokes ALL THE TIME, but never officially breaks the rules ? Well ban him, he does a disservice to the website.

Why is it SO HARD to understand, that you guys have to constantly ban/unban users, and then fold at the slightest pressure / complaint ?
 
This is so gay.
We went over this multiple times already.

Rules are not rigid, they're flexible. Rules serve the websites, not the individual users. So ironically, rules need to be applied on a case by case basis. Different users, different treatment.

One good user makes a terrible out of line out of the ordinary joke and regrets it ? Well, you can let it slide, even if the rules say otherwise.
Another user makes just poor and annoying jokes ALL THE TIME, but never officially breaks the rules ? Well ban him, he does a disservice to the website.

Why is it SO HARD to understand, that you guys have to constantly ban/unban users, and then fold at the slightest pressure / complaint ?
Why is this lowk W criticism
 
This is so gay.
We went over this multiple times already.

Rules are not rigid, they're flexible. Rules serve the websites, not the individual users. So ironically, rules need to be applied on a case by case basis. Different users, different treatment.

One good user makes a terrible out of line out of the ordinary joke and regrets it ? Well, you can let it slide, even if the rules say otherwise.
Another user makes just poor and annoying jokes ALL THE TIME, but never officially breaks the rules ? Well ban him, he does a disservice to the website.

Why is it SO HARD to understand, that you guys have to constantly ban/unban users, and then fold at the slightest pressure / complaint ?
stop taking the soyjack website so seriously, theyre bad jokes but if hes not joking about pedphilia i dont see a reason to ban him pwrmanently
>muh disservice to the website
just ignore him, banning eveything you dont like is rulecucky
 
just ignore him, banning eveything you dont like is rulecucky
Reasonable decision-making? Sorry bud, we don't do that here. Also good thing the rules are so "case-by-case", as you are currently "excusing pedophilia or the sexualization of minors" seeing as CX2 is literally a pedophile, child-rapist, second-coming of Peter Scully for posting the sentence "little anime girl feet" in a self-admitted "out of pocket" overblown joke that he later apologized for.
 
One good user makes a terrible out of line out of the ordinary joke and regrets it ? Well, you can let it slide, even if the rules say otherwise.
Another user makes just poor and annoying jokes ALL THE TIME, but never officially breaks the rules ? Well ban him, he does a disservice to the website.
I'm appealing to extremes here, but this means that a subjectively "good" user can come out and say "I want to rape babies in real-life" and get a pardon under the guise of "flexibility". Whilst a user who sticks by the books and does what he's told like a good little gentile is always under some amount of pressure as to not make subjectively "poor and annoying jokes" because God knows he's doing a "disservice" to the historically quality and serviceable Lesotho knitting forum otherwise. Who decides what makes good and bad here, because if it's the knee-jerk vagueposting rarely online inconsistent "flexible" jannies, then I can't help but pray that this dump will still has a single member kicking about come the end of this year. What a joke. "Disservice" fuck me you people are funny.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom