>Sorry ribbon. If it makes you feel better, it was never in the creepy sexual way and I would genuinely want to form a healthy relationship with you. But I'm not the man for this task.
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts
  • Boards are being moved around and added. Leave feedback in this thread and let jannies move your threads

Debate me why antisemitism is right, Ill wait

Micronesia said:
@supersage
Click to expand...
A race whose entire existance and folklore revolves around being "righteous" and above others (Deuteronomy 7:6, 14:2), got kicked out of over 1000 nation states in all of recorded history, made up an entire ethnic cleansing that never happened (The holocaust didn't start being teached in Israeli schools until 1962, and no historical books show any mention of it from the 1940s to the 60s apart from official Red Cross documents stating poor conditions in worker camps) and constantly genocides others simply does not deserve to exist. I'm not a pro-poopestinian by any means but I quite frankly think that no country should get away with shit like that,

Furthermore, jews constantly meddle with the business of other nations (Example: America, Killing of Kirk, The entire MAGA movement, Ben Shapiro)
Neither do they see non-jews as human (Yevamot 61a, Sanhedrin 57a) and do not consider their killings as human killings, that's not counting their entire satanic business about torturing chickens to death, allowing sodomy and so on.


Now obviously semetism also includes arabs, I do not like arabs because of their primitive nature, their following of a pedophile called muhammad (Aisha's age makes it very clear, even if it was "okay" at the time)
They also suffer from the same superiority complex jews do, calling for non-believers to be killed and for war to be waged against them (9:29, 98:6) and their entire sandnoob lives revolve around the concept of struggle (jihad) and terrorism, if you want a good example of why it never works, compare any arab city pre-western buildup (pre-50s) to any western civilization of the time.

something something skibidi toilet with natsoc irish bus burning immigration elements
1781178175227.png
 
Last edited:
supersage said:
A race whose entire existance and folklore revolves around being "righteous" and above others (Deuteronomy 7:6, 14:2), got kicked out of over 1000 nation states in all of recorded history, made up an entire ethnic cleansing that never happened (The holocaust didn't start being teached in Israeli schools until 1962, and no historical books show any mention of it from the 1940s to the 60s apart from official Red Cross documents stating poor conditions in worker camps) and constantly genocides others simply does not deserve to exist. I'm not a pro-poopestinian by any means but I quite frankly think that no country should get away with shit like that,

Furthermore, jews constantly meddle with the business of other nations (Example: America, Killing of Kirk, The entire MAGA movement, Ben Shapiro)
Neither do they see non-jews as human (Yevamot 61a, Sanhedrin 57a) and do not consider their killings as human killings, that's not counting their entire satanic business about torturing chickens to death, allowing sodomy and so on.


Now obviously semetism also includes arabs, I do not like arabs because of their primitive nature, their following of a pedophile called muhammad (Aisha's age makes it very clear, even if it was "okay" at the time)
They also suffer from the same superiority complex jews do, calling for non-believers to be killed and for war to be waged against them (9:29, 98:6) and their entire sandnoob lives revolve around the concept of struggle (jihad) and terrorism, if you want a good example of why it never works, compare any arab city pre-western buildup (pre-50s) to any western civilization of the time.

something something skibidi toilet with natsoc irish bus burning immigration elements
View attachment 139029
Click to expand...
Most of the incriminated Talmud verses are made up
 
supersage said:
A race whose entire existance and folklore revolves around being "righteous" and above others (Deuteronomy 7:6, 14:2), got kicked out of over 1000 nation states in all of recorded history, made up an entire ethnic cleansing that never happened (The holocaust didn't start being teached in Israeli schools until 1962, and no historical books show any mention of it from the 1940s to the 60s apart from official Red Cross documents stating poor conditions in worker camps) and constantly genocides others simply does not deserve to exist. I'm not a pro-poopestinian by any means but I quite frankly think that no country should get away with shit like that,

Furthermore, jews constantly meddle with the business of other nations (Example: America, Killing of Kirk, The entire MAGA movement, Ben Shapiro)
Neither do they see non-jews as human (Yevamot 61a, Sanhedrin 57a) and do not consider their killings as human killings, that's not counting their entire satanic business about torturing chickens to death, allowing sodomy and so on.


Now obviously semetism also includes arabs, I do not like arabs because of their primitive nature, their following of a pedophile called muhammad (Aisha's age makes it very clear, even if it was "okay" at the time)
They also suffer from the same superiority complex jews do, calling for non-believers to be killed and for war to be waged against them (9:29, 98:6) and their entire sandnoob lives revolve around the concept of struggle (jihad) and terrorism, if you want a good example of why it never works, compare any arab city pre-western buildup (pre-50s) to any western civilization of the time.

something something skibidi toilet with natsoc irish bus burning immigration elements
View attachment 139029
Click to expand...
And Nazis lost btw
 
A. The Talmud permits the killing of non-Jews

The quote used to prove this charge is: “Even the best of the Gentiles must be killed.” (Soferim 15:10) The quote is incomplete and out of context. Furthermore, those who claim that the Talmud encourages the killing of Gentiles fail to mention, or are unaware of, that the Talmud actually quotes a passage from the Mechilta (Beshalach 2), an important rabbinical text from the second century AD, which discusses the episode of the Red Sea crossing narrated in Exodus 14:5-7. What the rabbis are discussing in the Mechilta is not the right of Jews to kill Gentiles, but the irrelevance of the moral probity of the enemy in war.

How do the rabbis reach this conclusion?

Rabbinic practice involves interpreting the biblical text line by line. Here is what the text of Exodus tells us:

"Pharaoh prepared his chariot and took his men of war with him."

"He took six hundred chariots with chosen men and all the chariots of Egypt; in all of them there were warriors."

Starting from this biblical fragment, the rabbis ask themselves a surprising question: whose were the animals harnessed to these chariots, given that the biblical text tells us that the Egyptians' animals had been killed by the fifth plague sent by God upon Egypt (cf. Exodus 9:17), and the Hebrews' animals had not been left behind when they left Egypt (cf. Exodus 10:26)? Only one answer is possible, the rabbis say, the animals used by Pharaoh to pursue the fugitive Jews belonged to God-fearing Egyptians, whose animals had survived the fifth plague precisely because of the faith of their owners. Moreover, the rabbis say, since the animals would not have allowed themselves to be driven by strangers, the chariots used to pursue the fugitive Jews were driven by their own owners, God-fearing Egyptians. And then, the rabbis ask, what is the correct behavior in times of war, given that there may be individuals of good faith in the opposing army? Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai formulates an answer to this question when he states, “even the best of the non-Jews must be killed.” Rabbi ben Yochai does not incite genocide, but expresses a historical reality: in every war, righteous people are also killed.

B. The Talmud permits stealing from non-Jews

The example used to demonstrate this accusation is taken from the Talmudic tractate Baba Mezia 24a: "Jews may steal from non-Jews. If a Jew finds an object lost by a non-Jew, he does not have to return it."

The example has two problems:

1. It is not about theft, but about returning a lost object. The Talmud, following the biblical line, prohibits theft, and even more so theft from a non-Jew:

J. Baba Metzia 2:5 (7a): “It is worse to steal from a non-Jew than from a Jew because it also desecrates the name of God.”
Click to expand...
2. The quote is incomplete. The completion looks like this:

“Where is stealing from a non-Jew permitted? Rabbi Shimon said that Rabbi Akiva said on the road from Zephirin: this is how we know that stealing from a non-Jew is forbidden [Leviticus 25:48] “he shall have the right of redemption after he is sold [to a foreigner].”
Click to expand...
C. The Talmud states that non-Jews are not human

The quote used to prove this accusation comes from the Talmudic tractate Baba Mezia 114a-114b: "Non-Jews are not people. Only Jews are people."
Click to expand...
The quote is incorrect and incomplete. Furthermore, Rabbi Shimon and Rabbi Yochan are not talking about who is and who is not human, but about the conditions under which contact with a grave produces impurity. In its complete and correct form, the text reads as follows:

Rabbi Shimon and Yochai say: The graves of non-Jews do not cause ritual impurity in a locality because as it is said (Ezekiel 34:31) “You are my sheep, the sheep of my pasture, you are men…” You [Israel] are called men ( Adam ), non-Jews are not called men.”
Click to expand...
One of the methods of rabbinic interpretation involved relating biblical texts in order to decipher God's will. Thus, the rabbis put together Ezekiel 34:31 with Numbers 19:14 ("This is the law: When a man dies in a tent, whoever comes into the tent and whoever is in the tent shall be unclean seven days") because both texts use the Hebrew term adam for man. The rabbis' conclusion: if, as Ezekiel states, the term man ( adam ) can only be applied to Israel ⬄ only the grave of an adam (Jew) produces impurity.

It is worth emphasizing one more element, in the Talmud the term adam (man) is associated only with Israel to emphasize the idea of belonging to a unitary community. For non-Jews, different terms are used but they come from the same root: bnei-adam (sons of Adam) or haadam (man).

Here are two examples:

Gittin 47a: “ A non-Jew may buy land in Israel to dig pits and caves for as it is said (Psalms 115:16) “The heavens are the Lord’s but the earth he has given to the sons of men ( bnei adam ).”

Avodah Zarah 3a: “ Rabbi Meir said: How do we know that a non-Jew who takes up the study of Torah is like a high priest? We know from the verse (Leviticus 18:5) “the man ( HaAdam ) who does them [the laws] will live by them.”
Click to expand...
In both examples it is evident that the non-Jew is considered to be part of the human community.
 
Micronesia said:
A. The Talmud permits the killing of non-Jews

The quote used to prove this charge is: “Even the best of the Gentiles must be killed.” (Soferim 15:10) The quote is incomplete and out of context. Furthermore, those who claim that the Talmud encourages the killing of Gentiles fail to mention, or are unaware of, that the Talmud actually quotes a passage from the Mechilta (Beshalach 2), an important rabbinical text from the second century AD, which discusses the episode of the Red Sea crossing narrated in Exodus 14:5-7. What the rabbis are discussing in the Mechilta is not the right of Jews to kill Gentiles, but the irrelevance of the moral probity of the enemy in war.

How do the rabbis reach this conclusion?

Rabbinic practice involves interpreting the biblical text line by line. Here is what the text of Exodus tells us:

"Pharaoh prepared his chariot and took his men of war with him."

"He took six hundred chariots with chosen men and all the chariots of Egypt; in all of them there were warriors."

Starting from this biblical fragment, the rabbis ask themselves a surprising question: whose were the animals harnessed to these chariots, given that the biblical text tells us that the Egyptians' animals had been killed by the fifth plague sent by God upon Egypt (cf. Exodus 9:17), and the Hebrews' animals had not been left behind when they left Egypt (cf. Exodus 10:26)? Only one answer is possible, the rabbis say, the animals used by Pharaoh to pursue the fugitive Jews belonged to God-fearing Egyptians, whose animals had survived the fifth plague precisely because of the faith of their owners. Moreover, the rabbis say, since the animals would not have allowed themselves to be driven by strangers, the chariots used to pursue the fugitive Jews were driven by their own owners, God-fearing Egyptians. And then, the rabbis ask, what is the correct behavior in times of war, given that there may be individuals of good faith in the opposing army? Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai formulates an answer to this question when he states, “even the best of the non-Jews must be killed.” Rabbi ben Yochai does not incite genocide, but expresses a historical reality: in every war, righteous people are also killed.

B. The Talmud permits stealing from non-Jews

The example used to demonstrate this accusation is taken from the Talmudic tractate Baba Mezia 24a: "Jews may steal from non-Jews. If a Jew finds an object lost by a non-Jew, he does not have to return it."

The example has two problems:

1. It is not about theft, but about returning a lost object. The Talmud, following the biblical line, prohibits theft, and even more so theft from a non-Jew:


2. The quote is incomplete. The completion looks like this:


C. The Talmud states that non-Jews are not human


The quote is incorrect and incomplete. Furthermore, Rabbi Shimon and Rabbi Yochan are not talking about who is and who is not human, but about the conditions under which contact with a grave produces impurity. In its complete and correct form, the text reads as follows:


One of the methods of rabbinic interpretation involved relating biblical texts in order to decipher God's will. Thus, the rabbis put together Ezekiel 34:31 with Numbers 19:14 ("This is the law: When a man dies in a tent, whoever comes into the tent and whoever is in the tent shall be unclean seven days") because both texts use the Hebrew term adam for man. The rabbis' conclusion: if, as Ezekiel states, the term man ( adam ) can only be applied to Israel ⬄ only the grave of an adam (Jew) produces impurity.

It is worth emphasizing one more element, in the Talmud the term adam (man) is associated only with Israel to emphasize the idea of belonging to a unitary community. For non-Jews, different terms are used but they come from the same root: bnei-adam (sons of Adam) or haadam (man).

Here are two examples:


In both examples it is evident that the non-Jew is considered to be part of the human community.
Click to expand...
All this proves is that jews are big big liars who hate following their testament then, if they followed this to the dot then they wouldn't be shooting grenades into "Amalek" houses in Gaza, and conquering sandnoob lands in the Middle East, nor would they systemicially build israel on racism against gentiles.
 
Basically, Jews see it as a collection of opinions of people who were bearers of Jewish tradition, familiar with every aspect of it, and expressed their individual opinions on every question raised. That opinion could be debated, criticized, accepted, rejected, or in some cases, “ridiculed” (there is a lot of humor in the Talmud). That is, taking a single statement from the Talmud, out of context, tells us nothing about “what Jews believe.” It only tells us what the author of the statement thought was relevant to the discussion at the time.

In Jewish circles, a statement should always be cited in the name of the individual rabbi or sage who said it. Among anti-Semites, they skip this part and just say "The Talmud says" or "The Jews believe...".
 

Similar threads

cirno.enthusiast 2
First Janitorial election debate
    • TSMT
    • GEG
Replies
7
Views
55
shipment
shipment
JeetSMELLY!
  • Featured
LETS RAID 'ACKBOX, GARTIC PHONO AND DEBATE STREAMERS
5 6 7
Replies
124
Views
792
木制的尼尔森
木制的尼尔森
_73
Extremely long religious debate(MUST READ)(GONE SEXUAL)
221 222 223
Replies
4K
Views
4K
CX2
CX2
worldatwar
debate thread
Replies
18
Views
220
Chud
Chud
satoko_houjou_fan
warrior z debate
Replies
6
Views
177
Foggurt
Foggurt

Members online

... and 3 more.
Total: 570 (members: 53, guests: 517)

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom