this is my transitions goal btw
What will any party stand to gain from this though? What is the point of bringing CX2 back after a month if everything he posts from then on will be held under a microscope and brow-beaten for anything that as much as smells of something rule-breaking, regardless of the tone, intent, and reason. At that point either keep him banned or bring him back and let him continue to post as he has for months now with zero issue before Shroot got flashbacks to his heckin' problematic Discord butt-buddy posting lolishit on YouTube and decided to ban him over feelings and self-described complaints from "spergs".i think that cx2 noob should get a month or something ban
You quit before for the Broom so I simply don't care. A lot of users simply don't like the state of the site because of shit the few do, like what you've been doing recently. So it's just like the late Oldschlog again! And yet... You're unhappy because I banned a user for writing "little girl feet" because that's what I wrote on the rules since the beginning of the site? Lol noob just quit>But this forum isn't capable of it!
>But our userbase isn't attuned to doing anything!
>We're all so WORN OUT and EXHAUSTED from being such nonchalant oldGODS, even though time and again a select few break through the stagnation to do shit!
>That's GIGA Shroomfail!
Save me the excuses.
The golden collective of users who've stuck around and continued to post on this site daily since joining. The devoted users to your site. You can handwave and smugpost as much as you please, but it won't stop the death spiral. I can only hope the Mistsphere and similar competent competition will stand up to be either the killing blow or the wake-up call to rejuvenate this forum.
NO PEDOSOSOS NO LIKE THAT YEAH CORD real women GONE YEAH LIKE THAT YOU UNDERSTAND ARLLL GONNE BROWhat will any party stand to gain from this though?
Ok so if he's groomed then this site isn't for him either. This isn't the nuschlog and we don't host groomed unfunny dummys. I was willing to give him another chance and even told him to chill the fuck out until I just saw the "little girl feet" shit. I'll let Doll do whatever he wants with this noob and I started a vote in Jannycord but for now he's gonehillel is a pedough whos into blue archive pedoshit and has a history of hanging out with pedoshits
cx2 is just a groomed dummyed bait spammer or something i dont think perma isa good
>I simply don't care.You quit before for the Broom so I simply don't care. A lot of users simply don't like the state of the site because of shit the few do, like what you've been doing recently. So it's just like the late Oldschlog again! And yet... You're unhappy because I banned a user for writing "little girl feet" because that's what I wrote on the rules since the beginning of the site? Lol noob just quit
What gave you the notion that I'd consider what you think about me? Please get over yourself and stop trying to set-up these gay little pigeon-holes to seem like the bigger man and dismiss what I'm trying to convey to you now and potentially later. Relying on ad hominem's is gay as fuck.I used to think you were funny but you're just a boring uninteresting whiny contrarian now, probably from you hitting puberty late as fuck and just entered your edgy phase. Sad and many such cases
i understand not wanting to become like the shitty. but banned over 3 words permanently considering cx2 is already a trusted member simply because some "sperg" that's probably goot leaked over it is dummyed. lets not forget sloppyjakky did a cunny joke and all he got was a warning.And yet... You're unhappy because I banned a user for writing "little girl feet" because that's what I wrote on the rules since the beginning of the site?
ad hominemI used to think you were funny but you're just a boring uninteresting whiny contrarian now, probably from you hitting puberty late as fuck and just entered your edgy phase. Sad and many such cases
The based "little girls' feet" defender>I simply don't care.
>Proceeds to write more anyway.
"Ad hominem" did you just learn that recently? You sound like Socrates. If being a noob is your power then what are you without it?What gave you the notion that I'd care for what you think about me? Please get over yourself and stop trying to set-up these gay little pigeon-holes to seem like the bigger man and dismiss what I'm trying to convey to you now and potentially later. Relying on ad hominem's is gay as fuck.
weird that this person doesnt get perma'd but cx2 does over little real womenme feeti understand not wanting to become like the shitty. but banned over 3 words permanently considering cx2 is already a trusted member simply because some "sperg" that's probably goot leaked over it is dummyed. lets not forget sloppyjakky did a cunny joke and all he got was a warning.
View attachment 161343
I'll ban him as well. Since cx2 is less worse than literally bringing up pedo slang for no reason against other users I'll shorten cx2's ban and make them both temp but one more pedo related shit and it's perma for either one of themlets not forget sloppyjakky did a cunny joke and all he got was a warning.
You're like 16. And nobody gives a fuck about ad hominems except actual redditors who can't stand being insultedad hominem
its not about moderating him, its about where actually setting the line. noobs here make questionable posts every month, applying a perma to someone when another person got warned for close to the same reason (the warning one being actually worse because its a cunny joke) is really hypocritic.The based "little girls' feet" defender
actually illiterate [tsnoob]"Ad hominem" did you just learn that recently? You sound like Socrates. If being a noob is your power then what are you without it?
I didn't make a c*nny joke it was a reference to real womansoy saying the same exact thing last yearI'll ban him as well. Since cx2 is less worse than literally bringing up pedo slang for no reason against other users I'll shorten cx2's ban and make them both temp but one more pedo related shit and it's perma for either one of them
Intentionally excluding context here. Lol, lmao.The based "little girls' feet" defender
I don't know why you're asking me this but unless you count just under two years as recent, verifiably no. Is this suppose to be an actual slap-back to anything I'm saying or am I missing something here?"Ad hominem" did you just learn that recently?
its still a reference to a cunny joke are you dummyedI didn't make a c*nny joke it was a reference to real womansoy saying the same exact thing last year
how does that warrant a ban you shitgentinian noobits still a reference to a cunny joke are you dummyed![]()
flawed moderation. but something is somethingI'll ban him as well. Since cx2 is less worse than literally bringing up pedo slang for no reason against other users I'll shorten cx2's ban and make them both temp but one more pedo related shit and it's perma for either one of them
ad hominem againYou're like 16. And nobody gives a fuck about ad hominems except actual redditors who can't stand being insulted