>fuck this shit site
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts

le reddit political compass

why do you think that north korea is unfairly treated
They're still ruled by a horrible regime, but the fact that their society is treated beyond fairness (being truth) internationally is simply factual, as Western media organizations make up a lot of stuff about their culture and way of life that's only based off of hearsay from publications like Radio Free Asia or from ridiculous defector tales like those of Yeonmi Park, and these minute absurdities are then gobbled up by ignorant folk and disseminated further. Park, for example, being one of the most well-known defectors, has claimed in the past that there is no ice cream in the DPRK, that world maps are not at-all provided to the DPRK's citizens, and that there are no words to convey personal romance in the North Korean dialect. All of these are untrue, of course.
This is not to say that the DPRK is a hidden, disparaged paradise, but the West likes to say that it's an utter hellhole in all conditions and all circumstances, which I haven't found to be true.
 
They're still ruled by a horrible regime, but the fact that their society is treated beyond fairness (being truth) internationally is simply factual, as Western media organizations make up a lot of stuff about their culture and way of life that's only based off of hearsay from publications like Radio Free Asia or from ridiculous defector tales like those of Yeonmi Park, and these minute absurdities are then gobbled up by ignorant folk and disseminated further. Park, for example, being one of the most well-known defectors, has claimed in the past that there is no ice cream in the DPRK, that world maps are not at-all provided to the DPRK's citizens, and that there are no words to convey personal romance in the North Korean dialect. All of these are untrue, of course.
This is not to say that the DPRK is a hidden, disparaged paradise, but the West likes to say that it's an utter hellhole in all conditions and all circumstances, which I haven't found to be true.
North Korea just seems to be a terrible place to live with horrific quality of life and an authoritarian government, but, so are some countries in Africa and they aren't given the DPRK treatment where the west wants to claim it's literal irl Oceania with cartoonishly evil treatment being done to the citizens like whatever Park claims.
 
North Korea just seems to be a terrible place to live with horrific quality of life and an authoritarian government, but, so are some countries in Africa and they aren't given the DPRK treatment where the west wants to claim it's literal irl Oceania with cartoonishly evil treatment being done to the citizens like whatever Park claims.
Exactly. You ain't hearing this stuff about Eritrea or Equatorial Guinea.
 
Exactly. You ain't hearing this stuff about Eritrea or Equatorial Guinea.
However, I would like to see a sequel to the Interview where instead of North Korea, it's the Congo.
images (5).jpg
 
leviticus 18:22 leviticus 20:13
Those ban incest, not homosexuality. God has no problem with a normal relationship between men.

Analyses by Saul Olyan, Professor of Religious Studies and Director of the Judaic Studies Program at Brown University, K. Renato Lings, and others focus on ambiguities embedded in the original Hebrew, arguing these ambiguities may not prohibit all erotic expression between men but rather proscribe incest between male family members.[12][13] They argue English translators of Leviticus added to the original text to compensate for perceived lacunae in the biblical text; but thereby altered the verse's meaning. Leviticus 18:22 reads:
w'eth-zäkhār lö' tiškav miškevē 'iššâ​
And with a male you shall not lie the lying downs of a woman.[a]​
Lings argues the inclusion of prepositions not in the original text and the translation of Leviticus' otherwise unattested miškevē within the context of Genesis (i.e., miškevē is found only within Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13, and Genesis 49:4) is crucial to illuminate the incestuous connotation of the passage, and the translation of miškevē in light of Genesis results in the text of Leviticus 18 and 20 becoming more cohesive.[13]
 
Those ban incest, not homosexuality. God has no problem with a normal relationship between men.

Analyses by Saul Olyan, Professor of Religious Studies and Director of the Judaic Studies Program at Brown University, K. Renato Lings, and others focus on ambiguities embedded in the original Hebrew, arguing these ambiguities may not prohibit all erotic expression between men but rather proscribe incest between male family members.[12][13] They argue English translators of Leviticus added to the original text to compensate for perceived lacunae in the biblical text; but thereby altered the verse's meaning. Leviticus 18:22 reads:
w'eth-zäkhār lö' tiškav miškevē 'iššâ​
And with a male you shall not lie the lying downs of a woman.[a]​
Lings argues the inclusion of prepositions not in the original text and the translation of Leviticus' otherwise unattested miškevē within the context of Genesis (i.e., miškevē is found only within Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13, and Genesis 49:4) is crucial to illuminate the incestuous connotation of the passage, and the translation of miškevē in light of Genesis results in the text of Leviticus 18 and 20 becoming more cohesive.[13]
cacaot cope
 
Back
Top Bottom