>yeah, you know what. you are just a filthy chronically online esl noob shitskinned ape who doesn't know how to communicate and be friendly, I know you are trying to ragebait me but you fucking suck balls at your job, I am NOT your fucking slave, but I am a Slave to God almighty. You need to get your priorities straight with your life you dummy. Trying to reason with you is just talking to a brick wall, You are a lost clause you know that? Nobody loves you in this world not even this website. As what LowTierGod has said, "Your life is nothing, you serve zero purpose, YOU SHOULD KILL YOURSELF, NOW!!"
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts

Let's take turns creating a new 'jak

Untitled14_20250627113728.png
 
>Anthony Basedjak here, world's busiest internet music nerd. Today we'll be reviewing [generic rapper #30312] who's cock I'll be sucking metaphorically and literally for the next thirty minutes, praising xer's work endlessly, while I also give this new Stereolab album a 69 out of 420.
1751042571216.png
 
This looks dusty and i can tell you exactly why, it's try to be too real while not being traced, and using a brush that varies in thickness also adds dustiness
I'm using an online shitty version of MS paint, so that's why I can't adjust the brush size manually for a more consistent result, but I totally agree, it looks too specific and dusty rather than neutral and exploitable like Markiplier, Feral, Gapejak, and whatever else.
 
I'm using an online shitty version of MS paint, so that's why I can't adjust the brush size manually for a more consistent result, but I totally agree, it looks too specific and dusty rather than neutral and exploitable like Markiplier, Feral, Gapejak, or whatever.
Ink, solid, pixel size 5, circle is the way to go
pixel size 4 and 3 are good for smaller details if needed
 
Back
Top Bottom