modder and garf ban discussion

[supersage]

rule 3 is for more serious topics and potentially dangerous groups not some insta gc where only reels are posted

I mean we don't know if only reels were posted. There could be hidden content he simply bothered not to screenshot. Unless shroot actually scrolls through it then there's no way to tell.

 

[worldatwar]

the old instacord was much worse than this but the old members got unbanned

it was not that bad ironycaca

 

[Sloppyjakky`]

I mean we don't know if only reels were posted. There could be hidden content he simply bothered not to screenshot. Unless shroot actually scrolls through it then there's no way to tell.

then scroll through the gc then noob
I mean they literally gave shroot and invite link so he can see it for himself

 

[Hillel Hartmann (Pedo)]

then scroll through the gc then noob
I mean they literally gave shroot and invite link so he can see it for himself

uhhhh can you delete stuff on instagram GC?

 

[_73]

I'm 99% sure it's all just bait.

no he posted screenshots of xhis discord activities on here a few times iirc, so its not that crazy to think that he is in contact with a few folks on here(especially since a few people he likes on here also have confirmed cord accounts(jimbo and thrembolone for example))

 

[supersage]

then scroll through the gc then noob
I mean they literally gave shroot and invite link so he can see it for himself

That's what shroot intends to do, not me.
You'll have to tell him that

 

[worldatwar]

uhhhh can you delete stuff on instagram GC?

you can

 

[absolutely not dino]

Yeah but the thing about that is; it's a GC involving atleast 3-4 people, meaning they could fabricate random SNCA drama

nobody goes on a gc and says "hey dudes want to fabricate some fake drama on the shroom ?" these noobs barely caused any drama cuz all they did was post in the cordbox, the worst thing i could think of them doing is coordinating to spam someones profile wall and i dont see how this is worthy of a permaban (previous instacord on the schlog did this)

 

[supersage]

no he posted screenshots of xhis discord activities on here a few times iirc, so its not that crazy to think that he is in contact with a few folks on here(especially since a few people he likes on here also have confirmed cord accounts(jimbo and thrembolone for example))

I think he should be unpunished unless there's actually proven to be a GC, but that's up to shroot, not me.

 

[Sloppyjakky`]

when did we do this? show proof.

>Implying that there is not enough proof to prove the existence of oldinsta gc and wants proof

it was not that bad ironycaca

So you are admitting that the old insta group existed and it was not that bad?

 

[Hillel Hartmann (Pedo)]

you can

Then it's a devil's proof situation o algoe.
Well that's the case with all kinds of leaks. Not ideal.

 

[worldatwar]

nobody goes on a gc and says "hey dudes want to fabricate some fake drama on the shroom ?" these noobs barely caused any drama cuz all they did was post in the cordbox, the worst thing i could think of them doing is coordinating to spam someones profile wall and i dont see how this is worthy of a permaban (previous instacord on the schlog did this)

they were attacking hillel

 

[supersage]

nobody goes on a gc and says "hey dudes want to fabricate some fake drama on the shroom ?" these noobs barely caused any drama cuz all they did was post in the cordbox, the worst thing i could think of them doing is coordinating to spam someones profile wall and i dont see how this is worthy of a permaban (previous instacord on the schlog did this)

It could happen, and the stance afaik is better to be too triggerhappy when it comes to 'cords than to allow them.

 

[_73]

I think he should be unpunished unless there's actually proven to be a GC, but that's up to shroot, not me.

that is so dummyed
>guilty until proven innocent for hecking barf and pedorolla!!
>innocent until proven guilty for my cordbuddy shitllel!!! She would NEVER do such a thing!!!!

 

[worldatwar]

>Implying that there is not enough proof to prove the existence of oldinsta gc and wants proof

So you are admitting that the old insta group existed and it was not that bad?

hasty generalization fallacy

 

[supersage]

that is so dummyed
>guilty until proven innocent for hecking barf and pedorolla!!
>innocent until proven guilty for my cordbuddy shitllel!!! She would NEVER do such a thing!!!!

One is a GC and one is just an user having a discord account.

 

[_73]

One is a GC and one is just an user having a discord account.

he admitted to being in contact with 4 users on here

 

[worldatwar]

ironypedos are defending each other

 

[absolutely not dino]

It could happen, and the stance afaik is better to be too triggerhappy when it comes to 'cords than to allow them.

its not a cord its an instagram gc where they send eachother reels noob, atp just ban all sorts of offsite communication and steam because apparently you cant talk to anyone unless your chat is moderated by 10 cacaots since "you could be fabricating drama" or some shit.
hillel literally has 4 noobs from this site added on discord

 

[Hillel Hartmann (Pedo)]

that is so dummyed
>guilty until proven innocent for hecking barf and pedorolla!!
>innocent until proven guilty for my cordbuddy shitllel!!! She would NEVER do such a thing!!!!

Shroot knows what I'm up to, he knows I'm harmless.