- Joined
- Apr 20, 2025
- Messages
- 7,465
I meant syncing in terms of edits.secapedia is technically a mirror dude
I meant syncing in terms of edits.secapedia is technically a mirror dude
you're a dummyI meant syncing in terms of edits.
Which side, albeit?it's side
leftWhich side, albeit?
Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right, and here I am, stuck in the middle with you.left
you realize it is self-hosted right?It's dead
View attachment 153419
yummy ip addressesholy dead noob, genuinely rip.
View attachment 155766
it had a slither of a chance around mid June. Gape's poverty cooked the site by giving people an actual reason to use an alternative, If Gape could buy a site the website would've still been active regardless of "le fuggen quotecord n sheit".holy dead noob, genuinely rip.
View attachment 155766
This is why competition is good because there's SECApedia insteadholy dead noob, genuinely rip.
View attachment 155766
SECApedia genuinely has a much better written articles than I or any SNCapedian could've ever produced around the time the site fell off.This is why competition is good because there's SECApedia instead
Someone who is completely unrelated to any site is genuinely a better owner as they can't threaten to demote or ban you over shit. At that point why not use Soyjakwiki if Gape Newell owns SNCApedia? Wikis should be completely independentit had a slither of a chance around mid June. Gape's poverty cooked the site by giving people an actual reason to use an alternative, If Gape could buy a site the website would've still been active regardless of "le fuggen quotecord n sheit".
Well if we're ignoring SECA there would still be a reason to use SNCApedia as its well still looser than Soyjak Wiki is regardless of what people say.Someone who is completely unrelated to any site is genuinely a better owner as they can't threaten to demote or ban you over shit. At that point why not use Soyjakwiki if Gape Newell owns SNCApedia? Wikis should be completely independent
Controlled opposition. Gape is not known for being impartialWell if we're ignoring SECA there would still be a reason to use SNCApedia as its well still looser than Soyjak Wiki is regardless of what people say.
I'm just very nostalgic for the website. There was literally nothing wrong with the site in my eyes until December, it was perfection so its saddening seeing it go to shit. That's why I don't wanna have a new site. I just want this site and it for being better. But I know that is very long gone unless the other site dies for whatever reason but that's not gonna happen.Controlled opposition. Gape is not known for being impartial