>soyjak.party users will always lose their fucking shit whenever someone's has a happy relationship because if u noobs had one you wouldn't enjoy getting shat on 24/7 on the shroom like masochistic scum that you are, simply because its “attention”
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts

SoyBooru / Soybooru.com

  • Thread starter Thread starter Empire of Soyim
  • Start date Start date
  • Featured
  • General Soysphere 
  • Tags Tags
    boorucuck gillkoyim is a brappy caca jimbo was raped by a black homeless man kill all boorubraps kill all boorucucks musdummy was fu.ck.ed by many noob op here i'm trans btw op is a noob op is a cacaot op is a noob op is gaaay op is trans btw if that matters op was a sex slave for al quaeda snca trevor is a pedophile wordsalot is a cacaot wordsalot is a noob wordsalot lost wordsalot was raped by a black homeless man
General thread
itt we beat magnus to death with a shit-caked metal bat. And we also put conservativewaluigi in the gas chamber.
1757047512999.png
https://soybooru.com/post/view/135353
 
I got banned off the 'ru for posting this video making fun of Lolicaca

I'm guessing it was due to the image in the top right, but it isn't explicit nor is it meant to condone sexualization of children. + The video itself was allowed to stay up, either ban me and take down the video or don't do either.
1757087666599.png
1757087695979.png
These 'jaks on the 'ru have the same image, yet the person who posted them wasn't banned.
I don't get the double standard.
@Warrior-Z
 

Attachments

  • 1757087614120.png
    1757087614120.png
    569.1 KB · Views: 28
I got banned off the 'ru for posting this video making fun of Lolicaca
View attachment 46086
I'm guessing it was due to the image in the top right, but it isn't explicit nor is it meant to condone sexualization of children. + The video itself was allowed to stay up, either ban me and take down the video or don't do either.
View attachment 46088
View attachment 46089
These 'jaks on the 'ru have the same image, yet the person who posted them wasn't banned.
I don't get the double standard.
@Warrior-Z
bro they are just trying to throw dirt onto you
Don't take it seriously
 
I got banned off the 'ru for posting this video making fun of Lolicaca
View attachment 46086
I'm guessing it was due to the image in the top right, but it isn't explicit nor is it meant to condone sexualization of children. + The video itself was allowed to stay up, either ban me and take down the video or don't do either.
View attachment 46088
View attachment 46089
These 'jaks on the 'ru have the same image, yet the person who posted them wasn't banned.
I don't get the double standard.
@Warrior-Z
can you send this pepe
1757097693687.png
 
I got banned off the 'ru for posting this video making fun of Lolicaca
View attachment 46086
I'm guessing it was due to the image in the top right, but it isn't explicit nor is it meant to condone sexualization of children. + The video itself was allowed to stay up, either ban me and take down the video or don't do either.
View attachment 46088
View attachment 46089
These 'jaks on the 'ru have the same image, yet the person who posted them wasn't banned.
I don't get the double standard.
@Warrior-Z
Wasn't the one who banned you. It was another janny.
Me and SoySneed will figure this out.
 
Back
Top Bottom