- Joined
- Jul 12, 2025
- Messages
- 14,054
Why do you think?Wait why is he trying to add more Shitlita images
Why do you think?Wait why is he trying to add more Shitlita images
I mean it's obvious, but he's just DOING that?Why do you think?![]()
BecauseWait why is he trying to add more Shitlita images
Because of freedom of speech, shroombigotWhy he does this?
He lied about me leaking people's IP too without any proof. I have not only a screenshot of him doing it but also a local archive. I never leaked anyone's IP and neither did Catter, Broot, and Baqqrih. Literal projectionThe fact the schlog hasn't been labelled as a hostile splinter yet due to this is confusing to me
Im not gonna point fingers or accuse anyone but I feel like the only reason why it hasn't been marked a hostile splinter yet is because Z endorses it / uses it, and it being banned would mean soybooru would lose its 2nd in command adminHe lied about me leaking people's IP too without any proof. I have not only a screenshot of him doing it but also a local archive. I never leaked anyone's IP and neither did Catter, Broot, and Baqqrih. Literal projection
You could always let Warrior-Z know about the IP leak. I already emailed Soysneed about it when it happenedIm not gonna point fingers or accuse anyone but I feel like the only reason why it hasn't been marked a hostile splinter yet is because Z endorses it / uses it, and it being banned would mean soybooru would lose its 2nd in command admin
thats just a theory ofc
I already sent an email to Cobblestone, but thanks for the suggestion; I'll take it to sneed and Z and see what happens.You could always let Warrior-Z know about the IP leak. I already emailed Soysneed about it when it happened
Precisely. Soyjaks are meant to make fun of numales. They are meant to be ugly caricatures of them. Shitlita has always been a pedophile invention made by a literal pedoShouldn't a good soyjak be ugly and offensive?
Tsmt that is the diference between soyjaks and w*jaksShouldn't a good soyjak be ugly and offensive?
my name is moonmetropolis and im defending cp mess with me and my gang and we'll call you rulecucked
That's precisely the problem with Shitlita. If she was ugly, pedos wouldn't like her, same way pedos (hopefully) don't make p of babyjak since it's just a low res gapejak with a pacifier. Babyjak is also proof you don't need to make a jak (((aesthetically pleasing))) for it to be likeable.It's also weird that he likes it because it's "aesthetically pleasing". Shouldn't a good soyjak be ugly and offensive?
infectsMe. I argued for the removal of the Shitlita/Shoyta gallery because the wiki shouldn't archive banned pedophilic variants
i never saw doll as a rulescuck sort of guy. hell, the oldschlog wasn't even really rulescucked to begin with.
It's over (in the good way)Most Shitlita and shoyta images were deleted from the wiki. GlueMetropolis in shambles.
Even if I believed him on how it's just "the most visually appealing" variant (which is the opposite of the point of 'jaks, btw), this is insane.On a side note: This is kekful
View attachment 40597