angkar
Mold poster
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2025
- Messages
- 8,660
yet mine page was deleted by cobblestone because i was seemingly not prominent enough by their standardsthey're making pages for literal whos what a sorry ass site
View attachment 155040
yet mine page was deleted by cobblestone because i was seemingly not prominent enough by their standardsthey're making pages for literal whos what a sorry ass site
View attachment 155040
Wiki has been shit for ages (since Angeleno even)because apparently being a drooling autistic dummy who bumps posts he doesn't like on shitbooru 24/7 is way more noteworthy than holding multiple janny positions on various shitsphere websites and participating in countless soy """wars"""
when sprokemower was around was when it was at it's peak, it's been downhill from there.Wiki has been shit for ages (since Angeleno even)
All of the good people got a life now. Sad. It is what it is and nothing lasts forever but I wish I could experience the old fun Sharty one last timewhen sprokemower was around was when it was at it's peak, it's been downhill from there.
secapedia mogs the shit out of rulecuckedadminglazing.wiki>not a single reppey about it being down
Kek nobody actually cares about this
I genuinely have not used the 'ki since February I think.>not a single reppey about it being down
Kek nobody actually cares about this
I genuinely have not used the 'ki since February I think.>not a single reppey about it being down
Kek nobody actually cares about this
probably there's no announcement about it>not a single reppey about it being down
Kek nobody actually cares about this
Style it after 1d6chanLast night me, glisterald, fenriris and some others were talking about a potential redesign of the homepage, reverting to an older front page design. Also potentially removing the embedded article thing and going back to having 1 paragraph then a link to the page for the featured article. What do yall shroomies think?![]()
I think we shouldn't take a bald man with glasses Wikipedia that seriously. But if you insist I think simplicity would be the play.Last night me, glisterald, fenriris and some others were talking about a potential redesign of the homepage, reverting to an older front page design. Also potentially removing the embedded article thing and going back to having 1 paragraph then a link to the page for the featured article. What do yall shroomies think?![]()
So what if its not a serious site, still want the bald man with glasses Wikipedia homepage to look good. But yeah I do agree with you.I think we shouldn't take a bald man with glasses Wikipedia that seriously. But if you insist I think simplicity would be the play.
There can be more images but there are pages and templates on the home page now that no one clicks on or looks at. I'd rather all the links and content be interesting and important but that's just my preference.Looks very bland dont you think?
![]()
Isn't that the contrary of de bloating the siteFenriris is planning on adding banners to the wiki.
sorry all competent admins are deadIsn't that the contrary of de bloating the site
We dont know how theyre going to be implemented yet doe, could be a small skyscraper-style banner in the left sidebar, who knows.Isn't that the contrary of de bloating the site