>I wake up every morning and eat a nice big bowl of shit bran.
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts
  • Boards are being moved around and added. Leave feedback in this thread and let jannies move your threads

The Sharty is a Remote Access Trojan

Status
Not open for further replies.
I barely use the IRC, I just find you insufferably smug.
pot calling the kettle black
Same person who called me "tech illiterate" by the way, if your only rebuttal is Predditor-tier ad hominems then I think you don't understand what's actually going on
>i may have used ai to read through the code and send those emails, but i am TOTALLY smart, anyways your rebuttal is LE TERM I LEARNED FROM LE REDDIT
don't you have a telegram group to go back to splinterreal woman
1521 - animated, annoyed, marsey, eye roll.webp
Regardless, on a normal website, the code is static, the server can't change what the code does after the fact
Integrity.wasm/js is dynamic and is designed to make a request and execute whatever the server sends back in response. The server can change what the code does in real-time.
>this stupid fucking noob doesn't know you could just change what's being served
>this stupid fucking noob doesn't know how to use devtools to check the network tab for websocket connections or any polling requests to check dynamic content is even being served
yes "tech-literate" codecaca right here come save the sharty by removing the one thing that makes sure pedophiles like you dont come back


1317 - animated, cirno, gyate, laughing, touhou.gif
 
pot calling the kettle black
I'm the one trying to argue in good faith while you try to devolve the debate into shitflinging by calling me a splinterreal woman, pedophile, etc. You still have not brought up a single credible argument against what I've said.
And of course you're an rDrama real woman. Go back to doing it for free, otherwise, have a nice day
 
Last edited:
I'm the one trying to argue in good faith while you try to devolve the debate into shitflinging by calling me a splinterreal woman, pedophile, etc. You still have not brought up a single credible argument against what I've said.
Got it. If you want to call out the fact that they're not being truthful while still staying firm and composed, you could say something like this:




"You're lying about what I've said, and it's clear you're more focused on insults than engaging with my actual points. If you want a real conversation, let's stick to the facts and stop with the personal attacks."




This directly addresses the dishonesty while keeping the focus on the actual discussion. Would that work for you?
 
pot calling the kettle black

>i may have used ai to read through the code and send those emails, but i am TOTALLY smart, anyways your rebuttal is LE TERM I LEARNED FROM LE REDDIT
don't you have a telegram group to go back to splinterreal woman
View attachment 53407

>this stupid fucking noob doesn't know you could just change what's being served
>this stupid fucking noob doesn't know how to use devtools to check the network tab for websocket connections or any polling requests to check dynamic content is even being served
yes "tech-literate" codecaca right here come save the sharty by removing the one thing that makes sure pedophiles like you dont come back


View attachment 53410
Bruh he used AI to read the code?
 
Got it. If you want to call out the fact that they're not being truthful while still staying firm and composed, you could say something like this:




"You're lying about what I've said, and it's clear you're more focused on insults than engaging with my actual points. If you want a real conversation, let's stick to the facts and stop with the personal attacks."




This directly addresses the dishonesty while keeping the focus on the actual discussion. Would that work for you?
Why does Quote hire the most anal people to moderate his site?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom