Sloppyjakky
all my detractors are pedos
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2025
- Messages
- 12,971
>RULE 17: NO REPLYING TO THREADS
>RULE 18: NO SOYJAKS
>RULE 19: NO MAKING THREADS
>RULE 20: NO BREATHING
>RULE 21: DONT POST THINGS ON THE 'RU
>RULE 22: NO LOOKING AT THIS SITE
>RULE 23: NO TYPING IN THIS SITE'S NAME
>RULE 24: NO NO
>RULE 25: NO
View attachment 125451
Why's that?but outright making a rule against it is insanely dummyed.
If the jannies used and participated in the site they would see these posts before they hit the report queue.i get quotecord's obsession with "doctoddlers" bumping rule-breaking posts instead of reporting them, but outright making a rule against it is insanely dummyed. and then these same people call shroom a rulecucked shithole
I understand why, but having to make it a ban enforced rule is kind of a self-own. Quotykins example post was still reported twice, so what is the report threashold supposed to be for the joons to clean it up. If anything the nusoi clitty leakage made quote notice it more seeminglyWhy's that?
Fair enough I misread thatView attachment 125457
Are you sure you read his post right?
weed cacaIf the jannies used and participated in the site they would see these posts before they hit the report queue.
i can imagine many people baiting people into getting banned with this
If you mix this with soyquote autoban bait you can literally just censor anybody that warns the other nusois gegi can imagine many people baiting people into getting banned with this
actual dummys running the shittyIf you mix this with soyquote autoban bait you can literally just censor anybody that warns the other nusois kek![]()
This has always been the popular opinion, sadly. It doesn't seem to have changed.View attachment 126341
just ddos the site atp