what if Claus pooned out

[Gemerald]

 

[ATWA ya dig?]

She literally did THOUGH

 

[supersage]

@cutebooru and @cuteshroom gtfih

@garf too

 

[ATWA ya dig?]

@nagolbud HUMBLE THIS noob

 

[Soyspotter]

imagine plapping Claus poontang while xhes talmbout some "YOUR NOT WHITE ENOUGH FOR ME"

 

[ATWA ya dig?]

imagine plapping Claus poontang while xhes talmbout some "YOUR NOT WHITE ENOUGH FOR ME"

>Mein Kunt

 

[cutebooru]

@cutebooru and @cuteshroom gtfih

@garf too

why ping me here

 

[supersage]

why ping me here

Well what if Claus Pooned out? You pooned out.

Well what if Claus Pooned out? You pooned out.

my bad Claus capitalized

 

[cutebooru]

Well what if Claus Pooned out? You pooned out.


my bad Claus capitalized

PLEASE shut up LITERALLY every single post or ping i get here is pooner pooner pooner im sick of hearing that word. why isnt there a single normal person on this shitty forum

 

[worldatwar]

PLEASE shut up LITERALLY every single post or ping i get here is pooner pooner pooner im sick of hearing that word. why isnt there a single normal person on this shitty forum

can u do what i requested pls

 

[supersage]

PLEASE shut up LITERALLY every single post or ping i get here is pooner pooner pooner im sick of hearing that word. why isnt there a single normal person on this shitty forum

What but you did poon out?

 

[ATWA ya dig?]

PLEASE shut up LITERALLY every single post or ping i get here is pooner pooner pooner im sick of hearing that word. why isnt there a single normal person on this shitty forum

Maybe if over half of your posts weren't you obsessively reacting to pooner allegations, this would have died out already.
Just ignore it instead of posting shit like this as a response. I'm begging you.

 

[cutebooru]

can u do what i requested pls

NO

What but you did poon out?
View attachment 70503

Maybe if over half of your posts weren't you reacting to pooner allegations, this would have died out already.
Just ignore it instead of posting shit like this as a response. I'm begging you.

THIS ISNT BAIT THEY ACTUALLY THINK THIS

 

[worldatwar]

can u do what i requested pls

@cutebooru do this

NO

why not?

 

[supersage]

NO


THIS ISNT BAIT THEY ACTUALLY THINK THIS

do what ectstitties asked of you

NO


THIS ISNT BAIT THEY ACTUALLY THINK THIS

"They"?
I'm the one forcing this SNCA war to get us the reppeys, you keep seething I keep acting smug and the site gets 30 thrembillion peepeeheach and adolf shrootler will pin a medal to my bbc

 

[ATWA ya dig?]

THIS ISNT BAIT THEY ACTUALLY THINK THIS

You gave them plenty of reasons to think this, so, idk, maybe stop adding more reasons for them to think this?
Try being unbothered for a few days. I went through the pooner allegation hazing, I even played into it, but I came out unphazed because I never said shit like "I'M NOT A FUCKING POONER WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU GUYS I WILL LITERALLY CRUSH YOUR FUCKING SKULL"

 

[Gemerald]

I went through the pooner allegation hazing,

marge

 

[supersage]

^pooner above me btw

 

[Gemerald]

^pooner above me btw
View attachment 70506

Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

 

[supersage]

Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

that sounds like something a pooner would say