>Nah.
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts
  • Boards are being moved around and added. Leave feedback in this thread and let jannies move your threads

What would you do in this situation?

What do you do?

  • Total voters
    32
Sneedson said:
>Mexico is not a shithole
View attachment 29912
Click to expand...
nobody said this, FAIL!
IMG_20250622_225404.jpg
 
Even while the church doctrine I adhere to does not prohibit it, I've begun to hold a personal, negative disposition to remarriage for a case like this after re-reading last month Tertullian's (admittedly, a Montanist and thus at the end of his life a heretic, but his reason here I can not find fault in) De Monogamia, which discusses monogamy, marriage, divorce, and so on. My basic belief is that, if you have married someone and they perish (thus, this is God's law of death, rather than a separation caused by man; a divorce), you are going to possess that person in your memory and heart as your spouse until you die as well, as you are still in the world while they are not, and thus there is now no possibility to destruct your marriage to them. As such, it would be adultery to marry again after your wife's death. One particular excerpt from that text that contributed to my view here I've attached:
>"But if in that age [the heavens] they will neither marry nor be given in marriage, but will be equal to angels, is not the fact that there will be no restitution of the conjugal relation a reason why we shall not be bound to our departed consorts?" Nay, but the more shall we be bound (to them), because we are destined to a better estate--destined (as we are) to rise to a spiritual consortship, to recognize as well our own selves as them who are ours. Else how shall we sing thanks to God to eternity, if there shall remain in us no sense and memory of this debt; if we shall be reformed in substance, not in consciousness?
He then completes this argument with the following paragraph:
>Since this is so, how will a woman have room for another husband, who is, even to futurity, in the possession of her own? (Moreover, we speak to each sex, even if our discourse address itself but to the one; inasmuch as one discipline is incumbent [on both].) She will have one in spirit, one in flesh. This will be adultery, the conscious affection of one woman for two men. If the one has been disjoined from her flesh, but remains in her heart--in that place where even cogitation without carnal contact achieves beforehand both adultery by concupiscence, and matrimony by volition--he is to this hour her husband, possessing the very thing which is the mean whereby he became so--her mind, namely, in which withal, if another shall find a habitation, this will be a crime.
ecstasy said:
why is there a section of the epistle of paul the apostle to the galatians on the edit?
Click to expand...
The Galatians were Celts. That may have something to do with it.
 
baqqrih said:
Even while the church doctrine I adhere to does not prohibit it, I've begun to hold a personal, negative disposition to remarriage for a case like this after re-reading last month Tertullian's (admittedly, a Montanist and thus at the end of his life a heretic, but his reason here I can not find fault in) De Monogamia, which discusses monogamy, marriage, divorce, and so on. My basic belief is that, if you have married someone and they perish (thus, this is God's law of death, rather than a separation caused by man; a divorce), you are going to possess that person in your memory and heart as your spouse until you die as well, as you are still in the world while they are not, and thus there is now no possibility to destruct your marriage to them. As such, it would be adultery to marry again after your wife's death. One particular excerpt from that text that contributed to my view here I've attached:
>"But if in that age [the heavens] they will neither marry nor be given in marriage, but will be equal to angels, is not the fact that there will be no restitution of the conjugal relation a reason why we shall not be bound to our departed consorts?" Nay, but the more shall we be bound (to them), because we are destined to a better estate--destined (as we are) to rise to a spiritual consortship, to recognize as well our own selves as them who are ours. Else how shall we sing thanks to God to eternity, if there shall remain in us no sense and memory of this debt; if we shall be reformed in substance, not in consciousness?
He then completes this argument with the following paragraph:
>Since this is so, how will a woman have room for another husband, who is, even to futurity, in the possession of her own? (Moreover, we speak to each sex, even if our discourse address itself but to the one; inasmuch as one discipline is incumbent [on both].) She will have one in spirit, one in flesh. This will be adultery, the conscious affection of one woman for two men. If the one has been disjoined from her flesh, but remains in her heart--in that place where even cogitation without carnal contact achieves beforehand both adultery by concupiscence, and matrimony by volition--he is to this hour her husband, possessing the very thing which is the mean whereby he became so--her mind, namely, in which withal, if another shall find a habitation, this will be a crime.

The Galatians were Celts. That may have something to do with it.
Click to expand...
wordwordswordwords. i won't remarried because that makes my wife dissapointed in me
 

Similar threads

Onzikin
What is your opinion on the fillipina situation on twitter?
Replies
7
Views
80
_73
_73
jim🅱️o_fans_arent_white
ITT: Opinions you have that would put you in a sticky situation among soyteens
Replies
14
Views
194
Apeson
Apeson
sage
Hypothetically what kind of event or situation would transpire if the Fuhrer of Nazi Germany had sexual intercourse with a male African individual?
Replies
7
Views
147
Literal Who Number #271
Literal Who Number #271
pig
what would you do in this situation
Replies
0
Views
49
pig
pig
clanker 1000
if law enforcement does actually shut down all soyjak-related websites from some big raid what would you do in this situation
Replies
3
Views
69
ATWA ya dig?
ATWA ya dig?

Members online

... and 5 more.
Total: 1,148 (members: 55, guests: 1,093)

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom