Personally, I do not. It's an obvious cope for so many reasons.
Consciousness can be pretty well-explained within the brain; from all observations. So without it, there is no "you" nor life as we know it to experience
Though, I wouldn't mind hearing what you have to say, on the matter
I remember hacing a long discussion with one of my psychology teachers about consciousness, phenomenal experience and such.
I was defending physicalist monism and the "consciousness is a product of the brain theory" (Even though I don't believe it ofc), and my atheist teacher answered me that while this sure is the most believed theory within the scientific community, the scientific community as a whole had a really hard time coping with near death experiences.
Near death experiences are recorded cases of people having their brain activity completely stop for a while on the EEG scan, meaning everything shutdown, and restart a few minutes later. These cases are extremelly rare.
Curious thing though : Patients who underwent these experiences then vocally testify to having been subject to sensory experiences, with them hearing and seeing mostly stuff happening in the room they were in, sometimes in the room next door, and so on and so forth. This is rather consistent.
Now, scientist have tried to answer this phenomenok with multiple theories and explanations, but none are really satisfactory because you can read the cope in their studies. VERY small samples, poor methodology, hasty conclusions, asspulled theories... you have it.
Anyway, near death experiences are something the scientific community puts under the rug a bit, and something physicalist monism can't answer.
At least it kils the "brain is the source of consciousness theory" in my opinion.