>Nevertheless, without Claus, we would not have the dialectical process of threads discussing his BBC.
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts

Goonculture on the rise

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nihilma
  • Start date Start date
  • Rant 
  • Tags Tags
    culture goon gooning goonsesh with the transxisters in discord vc internet internet culture porn society
>mandatory chore
Alternatively you could just reintroduce traditionnal family values within society, in the context of Faith, of course, for otherwise people have no reason to follow said values.
people still raped and whored wayyy even before globohomo althoughbeitfully, it's happened for all of history, it's literally a part of humanity and you can't suppress it even with religion. The only way to get rid of this behavior is to change humanity and the very nature of sex itself, which to most is to say it is impossible, but i think in the (far) future sex will be obsolete

i mean do you really think people are gonna be porkin' each other thousands of years in the future? people then are gonna look at sex now like we look at lobotomies.

everyone who disagrees with me is a jartycuck gooner btw
 
It was inevitable, practically half of zoomer slang and culture is either some innuendo for masturbation or porn consumption or aping noob culture like speaking in ebonics which sometimes is even less intelligible then regular noob speak. The hilarious part is that they constantly talk about 'npcs' or 'normies' while simultaneously being so mentally stunted that they have built their entire worldviews from internet scam artists like Andrew Tate who only exists to fleece these poor suckers of their money, because obviously being raised on screens and consumerism all your life which just feeds you slop and poison 24/7 to make you weak and gullible so when the powers at be turns you into their slaves and your countries into 'economic zones', you won't resist or fight back, because they'll have thoroughly removed any type of autonomy or loyalty to your community, family or nation, so you'll be nice and compliant, you'll live in the pod and eat ze bugs because why is that any different to from life before.

Porn is a product of rapid individualism and consumerism, as is many other things but porn is the starting point for a lot of the problems we are unfortunately used to nowadays.
 
people still raped and whored wayyy even before globohomo althoughbeitfully, it's happened for all of history, it's literally a part of humanity and you can't suppress it even with religion. The only way to get rid of this behavior is to change humanity and the very nature of sex itself, which to most is to say it is impossible, but i think in the (far) future sex will be obsolete

i mean do you really think people are gonna be porkin' each other thousands of years in the future? people then are gonna look at sex now like we look at lobotomies.

everyone who disagrees with me is a jartycuck gooner btw
Sex isn't just about how pleasurably it has to be to you, you only think that because you've cranked your pecker to way too much bad driverslop porn. Sex is about reproducing, having more humans, it's literally the most natural thing humans have engaged in for all of human history. To act as if in the future there will be a time where humans don't need sex and we'll all just gladly except extinction as a species is fucking dummyed and you should kill yourself for saying it you gay cacaot.
 
Sex isn't just about how pleasurably it has to be to you, you only think that because you've cranked your pecker to way too much bad driverslop porn. Sex is about reproducing, having more humans, it's literally the most natural thing humans have engaged in for all of human history. To act as if in the future there will be a time where humans don't need sex and we'll all just gladly except extinction as a species is fucking dummyed and you should kill yourself for saying it you gay cacaot.
i agree that sex is for reproduction, but i think it's ruined by the fact that the desire for it is so sreal womang in most people. if sex didnt feel so good IN GENERAL, then there wouldnt be so many problems with rape and cheating. because the temptation wouldnt be there. and anyways most marriages have a shit sex life anyways you wouldnt be missing out on much, love is more than sex o algo
@baqqrih what do you think am i spittin' or shittin'
 
i agree that sex is for reproduction, but i think it's ruined by the fact that the desire for it is so sreal womang in most people.
Who gives a shit. If you're such a sex pest dummy that can't keep it in his pants for more than half a second you should be shot for being a degenerate, just cuz one prick rapes a women doesn't mean that there is something innately wrong with humankind and sex.
 
people still raped and whored wayyy even before globohomo althoughbeitfully, it's happened for all of history, it's literally a part of humanity and you can't suppress it even with religion. The only way to get rid of this behavior is to change humanity and the very nature of sex itself, which to most is to say it is impossible, but i think in the (far) future sex will be obsolete

i mean do you really think people are gonna be porkin' each other thousands of years in the future? people then are gonna look at sex now like we look at lobotomies.

everyone who disagrees with me is a jartycuck gooner btw
Marginal behaviour was marginal before, not globalized.
You can't get rid of it, but you can make it so it doesn't apply to fucking 30% of a whole generation.
 
i agree that sex is for reproduction, but i think it's ruined by the fact that the desire for it is so sreal womang in most people. if sex didnt feel so good IN GENERAL, then there wouldnt be so many problems with rape and cheating. because the temptation wouldnt be there. and anyways most marriages have a shit sex life anyways you wouldnt be missing out on much, love is more than sex o algo
@baqqrih what do you think am i spittin' or shittin'
I don’t know the exact context for this reply, but in this particular instance, I guess I do agree that the main drive for sexual immorality and sex crimes is the pleasure that the doers of the disgusting things receive. I don’t know what else would drive them to do that stuff. If we wanted to specify, perhaps it’s both sexual and sadistic pleasure that they seek from these sins.
As for marriages lacking sexual relations, to your point, they can still be joyful (look at Saint John of Kronstadt and his lady, Elizabeth, for example. Their sort of marriage was in and of itself a rare form of Orthodox ascetic arrangement known as a “white marriage”, albeit the exclusive purpose of this lack of sex was to further dedicate themselves to God rather than for any secular reason), but this is, of course, not the case for everyone. Saint Paul writes that it is “better to marry than to burn with passion.” If that passion remains burning throughout a marriage, however, then one purpose of that marriage has been lost for that couple, and so they will be faced with distraction and irritation when they could be bonding in the flesh to have children and to further love one another. To toss away that capability to make love with a spouse when one clearly longs for it would be as if someone had prepared a bowl of stew for himself because he was hungry, only to pour it out into his sink senselessly. So, certainly, some can marry without facing that flame of fleshly desire, but only some.
 
I don’t know the exact context for this reply, but in this particular instance, I guess I do agree that the main drive for sexual immorality and sex crimes is the pleasure that the doers of the disgusting things receive. I don’t know what else would drive them to do that stuff. If we wanted to specify, perhaps it’s both sexual and sadistic pleasure that they seek from these sins.
As for marriages lacking sexual relations, to your point, they can still be joyful (look at Saint John of Kronstadt and his lady, Elizabeth, for example. Their sort of marriage was in and of itself a rare form of Orthodox ascetic arrangement known as a “white marriage”, albeit the exclusive purpose of this lack of sex was to further dedicate themselves to God rather than for any secular reason), but this is, of course, not the case for everyone. Saint Paul writes that it is “better to marry than to burn with passion.” If that passion remains burning throughout a marriage, however, then one purpose of that marriage has been lost for that couple, and so they will be faced with distraction and irritation when they could be bonding in the flesh to have children and to further love one another. To toss away that capability to make love with a spouse when one clearly longs for it would be as if someone had prepared a bowl of stew for himself because he was hungry, only to pour it out into his sink senselessly. So, certainly, some can marry without facing that flame of fleshly desire, but only some.
Holy wall'o-text
 
1000011325.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom