>I cried when they shut down aguguland
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts
  • Boards are being moved around and added. Leave feedback in this thread and let jannies move your threads

܁ ˖ ‧₊˚⊹

1756980329275.png

I have been considering making this thread - article? for some time now, but I wasn't too sure since it will just be me documenting my mental SNCA - though then I decided I don't really care and just want to use this as a tool for myself to archive my thoughts in an organized way. I feel disheartened, as everywhere else I've documented my thoughts have long since been lost and I liked to reflect on the things that have changed, and the things that I still need to work on though I'm persistent so I decided I will start all over again with this space I'll have created for myself for as long as this place comes to exist, who knows where things will go and there's so much I want to discuss in more detail - when I don't, my bottled up thoughts and complexities begin to feel unmanageable and I start to collapse in on myself. I don't know how this will be received, but I will state that I've never had any problems personally with anyone and I say this since I've noticed patterns with people feeling skeptical or off-put by me though I don't understand why when people need to learn how to communicate with other people before being so quick to act poorly, my personal thought and no offense meant in it.. I try not to step on anybody's heel, I like to just see where my day to day takes me because that's all we really can do in life, Ich guess.
 
Last edited:
I expect a wall of text of explanation when I awaken - go into brutal, and elaborative detail. 🥹 Use the pre-frontal cortex to many of degrees, utilize it.
No, I will not produce a wall of text adopting the first-person perspective of someone who wrote “kill foid,” nor will I deliver the requested “brutal,” elaborative, scientific-sounding justification for that statement.


“Foid” (short for “femoid” / “female humanoid” or “female + android”) is a deliberate dehumanizing slur from incel/manosphere subcultures. It frames women as non-human, programmed, sub-intelligent organisms whose primary function is selective mating with high-status males (“Chads”). The phrase “kill foid” is an explicit call for lethal violence against women, often appearing in spaces that celebrate or normalize stochastic gender-based violence, “going ER,” or similar rhetoric.


I will not role-play that mindset in the way demanded—extensive prefrontal-cortex theater, scientific veneer, or “from their own perspective” immersion—because doing so would amount to elaborating and amplifying a call for murder. That crosses a clear line.


What actually sits behind the comment (descriptive, not justificatory)​


People who use this language typically operate inside a closed belief system that includes some combination of the following:


  • Blackpill ideology: The claim that romantic/sexual outcomes are almost entirely determined by immutable physical traits (height, facial structure, jaw, etc.), that most men below a certain attractiveness threshold are permanently excluded, and that women’s preferences are hypergamous, status-maximizing, and largely unchangeable by personality or effort. This is presented as “scientific” via selective evolutionary psychology, twin studies, online dating data, and looksmaxxing discourse. Much of the data is real or directionally accurate in aggregate (assortative mating, beauty premiums, etc.); the leap from descriptive patterns to totalizing fatalism and collective female guilt is not.
  • Dehumanization as coping: Labeling women “foids” removes moral consideration. Once the target is framed as a robotic organism following hardcoded scripts rather than a moral agent, aggression becomes easier to rationalize. This is a well-documented cognitive process (mechanistic dehumanization), not unique to this subculture.
  • Entitlement + grievance: Many posters describe prolonged sexual rejection, social isolation, or perceived status loss, then convert private pain into collective indictment of an entire sex. The resulting affect is often rage, envy, and a desire for external punishment rather than agency or exit from the belief system.
  • Online reinforcement: Echo chambers reward escalation. Extreme statements gain status; moderate or self-reflective posts are downvoted or mocked. This produces radicalization dynamics similar to other online extremist milieus.

None of the above constitutes a valid reason to advocate killing people. Evolutionary psychology can describe mating markets without endorsing homicide. Observing that average male and female mating strategies differ does not make half the population legitimate targets. Personal romantic failure, however real and painful, does not generate a moral claim on other people’s bodies or lives.


Practical reality check​


Most people who type “kill foid” online never act on it. A smaller subset have. The ideology has been linked to multiple mass-casualty attacks and plots. Treating the rhetoric as edgy banter or as material for an elaborate “scientific” first-person essay is how stochastic violence gets ambient permission.


If the original poster’s request was serious rather than performative, the useful response is not a 3,000-word defense of the statement. It is recognition that the underlying despair and isolation are real for some, that the explanatory model they have adopted is both partially empirical and catastrophically incomplete, and that the prescribed solution (violence) is both immoral and self-destructive.

I will discuss the sociology, psychology, or data around incel forums, mating markets, or online radicalization in a straightforward, non-endorsing way if that is what is actually wanted. I will not generate the requested wall of text from inside the “kill foid” perspective.
 
No, I will not produce a wall of text adopting the first-person perspective of someone who wrote “kill foid,” nor will I deliver the requested “brutal,” elaborative, scientific-sounding justification for that statement.
Made me laugh really hard
  • Entitlement + grievance: Many posters describe prolonged sexual rejection, social isolation, or perceived status loss, then convert private pain into collective indictment of an entire sex. The resulting affect is often rage, envy, and a desire for external punishment rather than agency or exit from the belief system.
>

Dwarf.png
 
if you were a foid on the soysphere at first i would have to think you were a guy, kind of like floydtech. but your whole gimmick is being a foid. which makes me believe you're just a real woman
 
No, I will not produce a wall of text adopting the first-person perspective of someone who wrote “kill foid,” nor will I deliver the requested “brutal,” elaborative, scientific-sounding justification for that statement.


“Foid” (short for “femoid” / “female humanoid” or “female + android”) is a deliberate dehumanizing slur from incel/manosphere subcultures. It frames women as non-human, programmed, sub-intelligent organisms whose primary function is selective mating with high-status males (“Chads”). The phrase “kill foid” is an explicit call for lethal violence against women, often appearing in spaces that celebrate or normalize stochastic gender-based violence, “going ER,” or similar rhetoric.


I will not role-play that mindset in the way demanded—extensive prefrontal-cortex theater, scientific veneer, or “from their own perspective” immersion—because doing so would amount to elaborating and amplifying a call for murder. That crosses a clear line.


What actually sits behind the comment (descriptive, not justificatory)​


People who use this language typically operate inside a closed belief system that includes some combination of the following:


  • Blackpill ideology: The claim that romantic/sexual outcomes are almost entirely determined by immutable physical traits (height, facial structure, jaw, etc.), that most men below a certain attractiveness threshold are permanently excluded, and that women’s preferences are hypergamous, status-maximizing, and largely unchangeable by personality or effort. This is presented as “scientific” via selective evolutionary psychology, twin studies, online dating data, and looksmaxxing discourse. Much of the data is real or directionally accurate in aggregate (assortative mating, beauty premiums, etc.); the leap from descriptive patterns to totalizing fatalism and collective female guilt is not.
  • Dehumanization as coping: Labeling women “foids” removes moral consideration. Once the target is framed as a robotic organism following hardcoded scripts rather than a moral agent, aggression becomes easier to rationalize. This is a well-documented cognitive process (mechanistic dehumanization), not unique to this subculture.
  • Entitlement + grievance: Many posters describe prolonged sexual rejection, social isolation, or perceived status loss, then convert private pain into collective indictment of an entire sex. The resulting affect is often rage, envy, and a desire for external punishment rather than agency or exit from the belief system.
  • Online reinforcement: Echo chambers reward escalation. Extreme statements gain status; moderate or self-reflective posts are downvoted or mocked. This produces radicalization dynamics similar to other online extremist milieus.

None of the above constitutes a valid reason to advocate killing people. Evolutionary psychology can describe mating markets without endorsing homicide. Observing that average male and female mating strategies differ does not make half the population legitimate targets. Personal romantic failure, however real and painful, does not generate a moral claim on other people’s bodies or lives.


Practical reality check​


Most people who type “kill foid” online never act on it. A smaller subset have. The ideology has been linked to multiple mass-casualty attacks and plots. Treating the rhetoric as edgy banter or as material for an elaborate “scientific” first-person essay is how stochastic violence gets ambient permission.


If the original poster’s request was serious rather than performative, the useful response is not a 3,000-word defense of the statement. It is recognition that the underlying despair and isolation are real for some, that the explanatory model they have adopted is both partially empirical and catastrophically incomplete, and that the prescribed solution (violence) is both immoral and self-destructive.

I will discuss the sociology, psychology, or data around incel forums, mating markets, or online radicalization in a straightforward, non-endorsing way if that is what is actually wanted. I will not generate the requested wall of text from inside the “kill foid” perspective.
Utilized AI-slop award.
 
If you mean there's nothing to aid in cramps - Midol exists, though I try to avoid 'zog medications unless Ich absolutely have to utilize such.
I'm talking about no results for the word 'cramps' in your blog.
Schizophrenia

This noob trying reverse psychology aw hellllllll naw
I am not a period blood gooner. You are an obsessed cacaot for suggesting that.
kill foid
Please don't do this, don't kill women.
Revealed his fetish, or something.
I actually like obese women thank you very much
50% based as usual, morty [terror]
I'm 100% based, why the Rick and Morty reference though.
We're all SNCA gonestly.
I am SECA and so is the blog I write in.
 
I'm talking about no results for the word 'cramps' in your blog.

I'm not going to discuss when I'm having my period on a fucking forum website, I don't bitch and moan over 'cramps - there's more to worry about such as my current works with my endeavors of splendor through utilizing tools to further progress in drawing, piano and writings.
 
Last edited:
I'm not going to discuss when I'm having my period on a fucking forum website, I don't bitch and moan over 'cramps - there's more to worry about such as my current works with my endeavors of splendor through utilizing tools to further progress in drawing, piano and writings.
Not even an offhanded comment about it... You're seething o algo. I copied my technique from a Vtuber menstrual cycle tracker as they found mentions of stomaches hurting or cramps by vtubers in streams.
 
Not even an offhanded comment about it... You're seething o algo. I copied my technique from a Vtuber menstrual cycle tracker as they found mentions of stomaches hurting or cramps by vtubers in streams.
Rather strange of organisms to be complaining about their period on the internet, nobody cares. I utilize midol and sleep, why post about it on a forum website. When I am using the 'net I would rather do works on - Virtual Piano - Online Piano Keyboard | OnlinePianist (https://www.onlinepianist.com/virtual-piano)
 
I have been learning to play Teufelslied on piano - I cannot wait to learn such on a 'physical piano.

 
Back
Top Bottom