>soyjak.party users will always lose their fucking shit whenever someone's has a happy relationship because if u noobs had one you wouldn't enjoy getting shat on 24/7 on the shroom like masochistic scum that you are, simply because its “attention”
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts

What is ur type? [Boyz only thread no stinky stupid female allowed!!!]

What makes it more authentic than protestantism?
My understanding is that it is the most directly descendant from the original vision of the first church. Protestantism is more a reaction to the corruption of Catholicism, and does away with some of the good traditions along with the bad.
Also, believing in all of this, I do find reasoning in "apostolic succession," where the priests are vetted by the greater church and have to be anointed by someone who was anointed by someone (etc.) who was anointed by one of the original apostles that were given the Holy Spirit directly from Christ.
Again though, I'm still figuring all of this out, and I will likely try a protestant church first, so my thoughts could change. I'm pretty open to both, but also the traditions and community of orthodoxy seems, in general, like it would be a more ordered structure for me, if that makes sense.
 
My understanding is that it is the most directly descendant from the original vision of the first church. Protestantism is more a reaction to the corruption of Catholicism, and does away with some of the good traditions along with the bad.
Also, believing in all of this, I do find reasoning in "apostolic succession," where the priests are vetted by the greater church and have to be anointed by someone who was anointed by someone (etc.) who was anointed by one of the original apostles that were given the Holy Spirit directly from Christ.
Again though, I'm still figuring all of this out, and I will likely try a protestant church first, so my thoughts could change. I'm pretty open to both, but also the traditions and community of orthodoxy seems, in general, like it would be a more ordered structure for me, if that makes sense.
Also, I'll add that I understand, like with many things in the old testament, God prepares us for different times. Obviously, early Christianity was heavily persecuted, where it isn't today. With that in mind, I'm open to the idea that orthodox traditions were meant for a more troubled time and that the rules can change
 
My understanding is that it is the most directly descendant from the original vision of the first church. Protestantism is more a reaction to the corruption of Catholicism, and does away with some of the good traditions along with the bad.
Also, believing in all of this, I do find reasoning in "apostolic succession," where the priests are vetted by the greater church and have to be anointed by someone who was anointed by someone (etc.) who was anointed by one of the original apostles that were given the Holy Spirit directly from Christ.
Again though, I'm still figuring all of this out, and I will likely try a protestant church first, so my thoughts could change. I'm pretty open to both, but also the traditions and community of orthodoxy seems, in general, like it would be a more ordered structure for me, if that makes sense.
Which kind of Christianity did you grow up with? I assumed it would be protestantism because I thought almost all americans believed in that.
 
Which kind of Christianity did you grow up with? I assumed it would be protestantism because I thought almost all americans believed in that.
Lutheran, but it really wasn't present in my life outside of me talking to God and informally praying, or the occasional time where my mother would read from the bible.
My brother is Orthodox, my other brother is Southern Baptist (I think), and my mother has recently returned to protestantism more than I've ever seen growing up, so I do get to ask plenty of questions.
 
Back
Top Bottom