>Welcome to the soyjak forum.
  • Welcome. Registering and having your account be approved may take a while since there's only one guy checking and approving accounts and guestposts

Why do you hate babyjak/Supreme?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Its "le bait" pedophilia, everyone knows what a sexualized babyjak implies and that's why its effective bait, yet dummyed "technicalities" (That could easily be fixed) make it so they don't get nished.
I do think using babyjak to depict a fat ABDL man COULD make sense in other contexts though.
you are a pooner not that i dont agree but you are a pooner
 
"Take your meds, during soot, kuz (well maybe not kuz he was an actual pedo), cabal, froot and early quote era you'd get banned for posting babyjak porn because it is meant to depict a child.
Only recently have the (((admins))) said it's an age regressor."

???
It literally has a stubble
The joke is that soyjaks are born with stubble and glasses dummy. Does it have the proportions of an adult?
 

>Why do you hate babyjak

marge, who even hates the cacajak?
If you mean specifically the cacas who infest the sharty, I don't see them any bad as well. Unless they're offsiters or extremely autistic like how Circus_2 does.

>Why do you hate Supreme

Popularized babyjak porn.

>Why do you hate babyjak porn

Implicit sexualization of minors, which SHOULD'VE BEEN BANNABLE UNDER RULE 2
A lot of semantics would derive from this argument alone, but basically it's the main concern that the sharty is accustomed to use cacajak to represent an underaged person, and making explicit material of them would Imply as sexual depictions of prepubescent characters.
Some argue that it doesn't resemble like a child or some shit, but the usage context of cacajaks is what creates the conflict in the first place.
 
  • Hmmm...
Reactions: CX2
but you’re acting like the whole soysphere bootlicks all the admins dude
1776242029420.png
 
I miss when most 'sphere flamewars were over amusingly frivolous matters that only applied to the Sharty. Anyways, in regards to explicit babyjak images: Not only is this really lame to care about, it is equally if not more gay to watch others take it seriously. The content is concerning, but you're also on a concerning side of the clearnet, what the hell did you expect? I'm not swinging in its favor here, but if you want moralcacaing, go back to Bluesky, Snapchat or whatever the hell it is you came from.
1775674629564.png
 
Last edited:
I miss when most 'sphere flamewars were over amusingly frivolous matters that only applied to the Sharty. Anyways, in regards to explicit babyjak images: Not only is this really lame to care about, it is equally if not more gay to watch others take it seriously. The content is concerning, but you're also on a concerning side of the clearnet, what the hell did you expect? I'm not swinging in its favor here, but if you want moralcacaing, go back to Bluesky, Snapchat or whatever the hell it is you came from.
View attachment 123136
This isn’t—and shouldn’t be—4chan
 
Last edited:
I miss when most 'sphere flamewars were over amusingly frivolous matters that only applied to the Sharty. Anyways, in regards to explicit babyjak images: Not only is this really lame to care about, it is equally if not more gay to watch others take it seriously. The content is concerning, but you're also on a concerning side of the clearnet, what the hell did you expect? I'm not swinging in its favor here, but if you want moralcacaing, go back to Bluesky, Snapchat or whatever the hell it is you came from.
View attachment 123136
but im a moralGOD myself doe
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom